Suppr超能文献

机械通气期间通过间接测热法测量肺泡通气和死腔变化:一项实验室及临床验证

Measurement of alveolar ventilation and changes in deadspace by indirect calorimetry during mechanical ventilation: a laboratory and clinical validation.

作者信息

Kiiski R, Takala J, Eissa N T

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Kuopio University Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1991 Oct;19(10):1303-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199110000-00013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the assessment of changes in alveolar ventilation and deadspace by indirect calorimetry.

DESIGN

An open comparison of two methods using a criterion standard.

METHODS

Simultaneous measurement of minute ventilation with a metabolic monitor and a pneumotachometer during controlled and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in intensive care patients (n = 14). Measurement of a change in alveolar ventilation with three different tidal volume values in a single-compartment lung model using an added external deadspace. Alveolar ventilation and deadspace/tidal volume were calculated from Bohr's equation using end-tidal PCO2 for the alveolar PCO2 value.

RESULTS

The mean differences between minute ventilation measured by a metabolic monitor and minute ventilation measured by a pneumotachometer during controlled and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation were -0.04 +/- 0.61 (SD) L and 0.01 +/- 0.85 L, respectively. No significant difference was observed between measurements at the endotracheal tube and the expiratory port of the ventilator. In studies using the lung model, the external deadspace represented 6% to 19% of the three tidal volume measurements. The mean difference between the actual and measured deadspace was 3 +/- 9 mL (8.2 +/- 4.7%), with a slightly, but not significantly, lower precision at the high tidal volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in alveolar ventilation and deadspace can be accurately measured by combined use of indirect calorimetry and end-tidal CO2 analysis.

摘要

目的

通过间接测热法验证肺泡通气和死腔变化的评估。

设计

使用标准对照对两种方法进行开放比较。

方法

在重症监护患者(n = 14)进行控制和同步间歇指令通气期间,同时使用代谢监测仪和呼吸流速计测量分钟通气量。在单室肺模型中,通过增加外部死腔,使用三种不同潮气量值测量肺泡通气的变化。根据Bohr方程,使用呼气末PCO2作为肺泡PCO2值来计算肺泡通气和死腔/潮气量。

结果

在控制和同步间歇指令通气期间,代谢监测仪测量的分钟通气量与呼吸流速计测量的分钟通气量之间的平均差异分别为-0.04±0.61(标准差)L和0.01±0.85 L。在气管插管处和呼吸机呼气端口处的测量之间未观察到显著差异。在使用肺模型的研究中,外部死腔占三个潮气量测量值的6%至19%。实际死腔与测量死腔之间的平均差异为3±9 mL(8.2±4.7%),在高潮气量时精度略低,但差异不显著。

结论

联合使用间接测热法和呼气末二氧化碳分析可准确测量肺泡通气和死腔的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验