• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对特征的注意的试验间抑制受任务相关性调节。

Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.

作者信息

Levinthal Brian R, Lleras Alejandro

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2008 Nov 21;8(15):12.1-15. doi: 10.1167/8.15.12.

DOI:10.1167/8.15.12
PMID:19146296
Abstract

The Distractor Previewing Effect (DPE) is an inter-trial effect that arises in efficient visual searches where participants are asked to find a feature oddball in the display. Specifically, the DPE is the finding that an observer's ability to focus on an oddball target is impaired if, on the immediately preceding trial, no target was present and all distractors shared a visual feature with the current target (e.g., all objects were red on trial N, and the target was a red oddball on trial N + 1). Though recent evidence suggests that the DPE emerges from an attentional bias against focusing on a recently examined feature common to all stimuli in a target-absent trial, it is unclear whether this inhibition is formed for all features in target-absent trials, or is instead limited to the search-relevant feature. In two experiments we manipulated task instructions while keeping displays identical, alternating which feature (shape or color) was relevant for the search task and which was not. Our results showed that attentional inhibition is applied only to the search-relevant feature. Additionally we found that although search-irrelevant features affect search times, these effects are independent of any relationship to the previous trial.

摘要

干扰项预视效应(DPE)是一种试间效应,出现在高效视觉搜索任务中,即要求参与者在显示屏中找出一个特征异常的目标。具体而言,DPE是指这样一个发现:如果在前一次试验中没有目标出现,且所有干扰项都与当前目标共享一个视觉特征(例如,在第N次试验中所有物体都是红色的,而在第N + 1次试验中目标是一个红色的异常项),那么观察者聚焦于异常目标的能力就会受损。尽管最近的证据表明,DPE源于对在前一次无目标试验中所有刺激共有的最近检查过的特征的注意力偏差,但尚不清楚这种抑制是在无目标试验中对所有特征形成的,还是仅限于与搜索相关的特征。在两个实验中,我们在保持显示屏相同的情况下操纵任务指令,交替改变哪个特征(形状或颜色)与搜索任务相关以及哪个特征不相关。我们的结果表明,注意力抑制仅应用于与搜索相关的特征。此外,我们发现,尽管与搜索无关的特征会影响搜索时间,但这些影响与前一次试验的任何关系无关。

相似文献

1
Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.对特征的注意的试验间抑制受任务相关性调节。
J Vis. 2008 Nov 21;8(15):12.1-15. doi: 10.1167/8.15.12.
2
The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.试验的剩余部分:目标确定的选择性注意的试验间抑制
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:195-213. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17611-2.
3
Age-related effects in inter-trial inhibition of attention.注意内试验抑制的年龄相关效应。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2011 Sep;18(5):562-76. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.591771. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
4
Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.视觉搜索任务中沿多个特征维度的同时启动
Vision Res. 2006 Aug;46(16):2554-70. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.015. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
5
A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.搜索顺序失去作用:忽略单一干扰项会影响视觉搜索效率。
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
6
Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.在聚焦注意力任务中,干扰项干扰并非由注意力捕获介导。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Sep;62(9):1685-95. doi: 10.1080/17470210902811223. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
7
Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.目标和干扰物异质性对颜色目标搜索的影响。
Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(14):1885-99. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.007.
8
Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.弹出式搜索中的扫视排斥:目标的可疑历史如何使眼睛远离它。
J Vis. 2010 Dec 6;10(14):9. doi: 10.1167/10.14.9.
9
Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.试验间目标特征的变化不会因单独元素而导致更多干扰:目标不确定性才会。
Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
10
Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.试验间重复促进时间选择:空间和时间搜索的共同机制。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):243-51. doi: 10.1177/0956797609357928. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Rejecting an irrelevant singleton in the absence of a competing target.在没有竞争目标的情况下拒绝一个无关的单例。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1083-1097. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03069-8. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
Not all "distractor" tags are created equal: using a search asymmetry to dissociate the inter-trial effects caused by different forms of distractors.并非所有“干扰”标签都是一样的:利用搜索不对称性来区分不同形式干扰物所引起的试验间效应。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 30;5:669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00669. eCollection 2014.
3
Modeling the effect of selection history on pop-out visual search.
模拟选择历史对弹出式视觉搜索的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e89996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089996. eCollection 2014.
4
Category-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials.基于类别抑制的连续试次间集中注意。
Psychophysiology. 2013 Apr;50(4):365-76. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12022. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
5
Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.分心物抑制强度的差异并不影响分心物-反应绑定。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Apr;40(3):373-87. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1.