Suppr超能文献

去除微生物对患者来源的牙科印模进行消毒效果的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of removing microorganisms to disinfect patient-derived dental impressions.

作者信息

Egusa Hiroshi, Watamoto Takao, Matsumoto Takuya, Abe Keiko, Kobayashi Munemasa, Akashi Yoshihiro, Yatani Hirofumi

机构信息

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2008 Nov-Dec;21(6):531-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Disinfection of dental impressions is an indispensable procedure for the control of cross-contamination; however, there is limited information on the efficacy of disinfection under clinical conditions. The objective of this study was to clinically evaluate the disinfection efficacy of commercially available agents in removing oral pathogens from patient-derived impressions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Impressions from 54 patients were divided into groups and either left undisinfected or underwent 1 of 5 disinfection treatments: (1) 2% glutaraldehyde (GA), (2) 1% sodium hypochlorite (SH), (3) 0.25% benzalkonium chloride (BC), (4) 1 ppm ozonated water (OW), or (5) the Hygojet/MD520 system (HJ). An impression culture technique using a brain heart infusion agar medium was used to visualize the microbial contamination on the surface of the impression cultures. The persistent presence of oral pathogens on the impression cultures was examined using selective isolation agar plates.

RESULTS

The isolation frequencies of streptococci, staphylococci, Candida, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa species from undisinfected impressions were 100%, 55.6%, 25.9%, 25.9% and 5.6%, respectively. Disinfection with HJ and BC removed the microorganisms with the greatest efficacy, followed by GA, SH, and OW. Potential bacterial contamination could be detected even after disinfection had been performed. Combined use of BC plus GA or SH removed oral pathogens almost completely from dental impressions.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation showed that potential contaminants are still present, even after general disinfection procedures. Therefore, either HJ or the combined use of BC with GA or SH is recommended for clinical and laboratory use.

摘要

目的

牙印模消毒是控制交叉污染必不可少的程序;然而,关于临床条件下消毒效果的信息有限。本研究的目的是临床评估市售制剂从患者来源的印模中去除口腔病原体的消毒效果。

材料与方法

将54例患者的印模分组,一组不进行消毒,其余接受5种消毒处理之一:(1)2%戊二醛(GA),(2)1%次氯酸钠(SH),(3)0.25%苯扎氯铵(BC),(4)1 ppm臭氧水(OW),或(5)Hygojet/MD520系统(HJ)。采用脑心浸液琼脂培养基的印模培养技术来观察印模培养物表面的微生物污染情况。使用选择性分离琼脂平板检测印模培养物上口腔病原体的持续存在情况。

结果

未消毒印模中链球菌、葡萄球菌、念珠菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的分离频率分别为100%、55.6%、25.9%、25.9%和5.6%。HJ和BC消毒去除微生物的效果最佳,其次是GA、SH和OW。即使进行了消毒,仍可检测到潜在的细菌污染。BC与GA或SH联合使用几乎可完全去除牙印模上的口腔病原体。

结论

本研究表明,即使经过常规消毒程序,仍可能存在潜在污染物。因此,建议临床和实验室使用HJ或BC与GA或SH联合使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验