Mahalakshmi A S, Jeyapalan Vidhya, Mahadevan Vallabh, Krishnan Chitra Shankar, Azhagarasan N S, Ramakrishnan Hariharan
Department of Prosthodontics, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Jan-Mar;19(1):33-41. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_72_18.
The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the effect of chemical disinfectants on the surface detail reproduction, dimensional stability and surface texture of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions.
The impressions were then divided into five groups (fifteen samples per group) and subjected to a ten minutes immersion with 2% glutaraldehyde (Group I), 1% sodium hypochlorite (Group II), freshly prepared electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) with different pH values - acidic (Group III), alkali (Group IV) and neutral (Group V). The samples were examined pre and post-immersion under visual observation for surface detail reproduction, travelling microscope for measurement of dimensional stability and surface profilometer (3D) for evaluation of surface texture. A standardized master die was fabricated and seventy-five PVS test samples were made. The samples were subjected to immersion disinfection and studied for surface detail reproduction, dimensional stability and surface texture. test, paired test and ANOVA were used to analyze dimensional stability statistically both within and between the test groups.
The surface detail reproduction was satisfactory with both pre and post-immersion test samples. A statistically significant dimensional change was observed post-immersion in Groups II, III and V test samples and a statistically insignificant dimensional change was observed in Groups I and IV test samples. There was a negligible change in surface texture post-immersion in Groups I, III, IV and V test samples with a slight increase in surface roughness post-immersion in Group II samples.
In this study, all the test disinfectants produced satisfactory surface detail reproduction on Polyvinyl siloxane impressions. 2% glutaraldehyde and electrolyzed oxidizing water (alkali) have resulted in statistically insignificant dimensional change, while 1% sodium hypochlorite, electrolyzed oxidizing water (acidic) and electrolyzed oxidizing water (neutral) have resulted in statistically significant dimensional changes. All the test disinfectants except 1% sodium hypochlorite showed a reduction in surface roughness (Ra) values.
本研究旨在比较评估化学消毒剂对聚乙烯基硅氧烷(PVS)印模表面细节再现、尺寸稳定性和表面纹理的影响。
将印模分为五组(每组15个样本),分别用2%戊二醛浸泡10分钟(第一组)、1%次氯酸钠浸泡10分钟(第二组)、不同pH值的新鲜制备的电解氧化水浸泡10分钟——酸性(第三组)、碱性(第四组)和中性(第五组)。在浸泡前后通过目视观察检查样本的表面细节再现情况,用移动显微镜测量尺寸稳定性,用表面轮廓仪(3D)评估表面纹理。制作了一个标准化的母模,并制作了75个PVS测试样本。对样本进行浸泡消毒,并研究其表面细节再现、尺寸稳定性和表面纹理。采用t检验、配对t检验和方差分析对测试组内和组间的尺寸稳定性进行统计学分析。
浸泡前后的测试样本表面细节再现均令人满意。在第二组、第三组和第五组测试样本浸泡后观察到有统计学意义的尺寸变化,而在第一组和第四组测试样本浸泡后观察到无统计学意义的尺寸变化。第一组、第三组、第四组和第五组测试样本浸泡后表面纹理变化可忽略不计,第二组样本浸泡后表面粗糙度略有增加。
在本研究中,所有测试消毒剂在聚乙烯基硅氧烷印模上均产生了令人满意的表面细节再现。2%戊二醛和电解氧化水(碱性)导致的尺寸变化无统计学意义,而1%次氯酸钠、电解氧化水(酸性)和电解氧化水(中性)导致的尺寸变化有统计学意义。除1%次氯酸钠外,所有测试消毒剂的表面粗糙度(Ra)值均有所降低。