• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination of ceftazidime-tobramycin in comparison with ceftazidime in lower respiratory tract infections.

作者信息

Chaudhary Manu, Shrivastava Sanjay Mohan, Sehgal Rajesh

机构信息

Venus Medicine Research Centre, Venus Remedies limited, India.

出版信息

Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jan;4(1):62-6. doi: 10.2174/157488409787236119.

DOI:10.2174/157488409787236119
PMID:19149503
Abstract

Lower respiratory tract infections are major cause of morbidity and mortality. Objectives were to evaluate efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination (FDC) of Ceftazidime and Tobramycin in comparison with Ceftazidime alone in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Patients (n=240) were randomly distributed in two arms: one arm was treated with Ceftazidime(1g)-Tobramycin(120mg) and other arm was treated with Ceftazidime (1g) alone. Patients were clinically, radiologically and bacteriologically evaluated. Clinically successful outcome was seen in 88.4% of the patients in Ceftazidime-Tobramycin treated group as compared to 61.2% in Ceftazidime alone treated group. In Ceftazidime-Tobramycin treated group, majority of pathogen isolated were H.inflenzae (35%), P. aeruginosa (24.16%), K. pneumoniae (16.66%) and M. catarrhalis (24.16%), whereas in Ceftazidime alone treated group majority of pathogen isolated were H.inflenzae (33.33%), P. aeruginosa (20%), K. pneumoniae (18.33%) and M. catarrhalis (28.33%). In Ceftazidime-Tobramycin treated group (98%), a significantly higher bacterial eradication was observed than Ceftazidime alone treated group (79%). Radiological improvement was also superior in Ceftazidime-Tobramycin treated group. No major adverse events were observed. Results showed that fixed dose combination of Ceftazidime Tobramycin is superior than Ceftazidime alone in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination of ceftazidime-tobramycin in comparison with ceftazidime in lower respiratory tract infections.
Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jan;4(1):62-6. doi: 10.2174/157488409787236119.
2
Empiric treatment of hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infections with meropenem or ceftazidime with tobramycin: a randomized study. Meropenem Lower Respiratory Infection Group.美罗培南或头孢他啶联合妥布霉素经验性治疗医院获得性下呼吸道感染:一项随机研究。美罗培南下呼吸道感染组。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Oct;25(10):1663-70. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199710000-00015.
3
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus tobramycin versus ceftazidime plus tobramycin for the treatment of patients with nosocomial lower respiratory tract infection. Piperacillin/tazobactam Nosocomial Pneumonia Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合妥布霉素与头孢他啶联合妥布霉素治疗医院获得性下呼吸道感染患者的疗效比较。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦医院获得性肺炎研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Mar;43(3):389-97. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.3.389.
4
[Comparison of the effectiveness of ceftazidime and cefazolin/tobramycin in patients with inflammatory diseases of the lower respiratory tract].
Infection. 1987;15 Suppl 4:S192-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01645869.
5
[Ceftazidime with and without tobramycin versus azlocillin plus tobramycin in the therapy of bronchopulmonary infections in intensive care patients].
Infection. 1987;15 Suppl 4:S185-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01645868.
6
Efficacy and safety of aztreonam versus tobramycin for aerobic gram-negative bacilli lower respiratory tract infections.
Am J Med. 1985 Feb 8;78(2A):42-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90202-5.
7
Controlled trial of ceftazidime vs. ticarcillin and tobramycin in the treatment of acute respiratory exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis.头孢他啶与替卡西林及妥布霉素治疗囊性纤维化患者急性呼吸加重的对照试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Mar-Apr;4(2):172-7. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198503000-00012.
8
Efficacy of once-daily tobramycin monotherapy for acute pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis: a preliminary study.每日一次妥布霉素单药治疗囊性纤维化急性肺部加重的疗效:一项初步研究。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2001 May;31(5):367-76. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1060.
9
Ceftazidime compared with piperacillin and tobramycin for the empiric treatment of fever in neutropenic patients with cancer. A multicenter randomized trial. The Intercontinental Antimicrobial Study Group.头孢他啶与哌拉西林和妥布霉素用于癌症中性粒细胞减少患者发热的经验性治疗比较。一项多中心随机试验。洲际抗菌研究组。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 May 15;120(10):834-44. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-10-199405150-00004.
10
The efficacy and safety of isepamicin and ceftazidime compared with amikacin and ceftazidime in acute lower respiratory tract infection.异帕米星与头孢他啶联用对比阿米卡星与头孢他啶联用在急性下呼吸道感染中的疗效及安全性
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:129-35.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of acute and emergency care interventions for adolescents and adults with severe acute respiratory infections including COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries.一项针对中低收入国家中患有严重急性呼吸道感染(包括 COVID-19)的青少年和成年人的急性和紧急护理干预措施的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2022 Nov 8;12:05039. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05039.
2
Combination antibiotics against , representing common and rare cystic fibrosis strains from different Irish clinics.针对来自不同爱尔兰诊所的常见和罕见囊性纤维化菌株的联合抗生素。
Heliyon. 2018 Mar 8;4(3):e00562. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00562. eCollection 2018 Mar.
3
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.
β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗败血症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 7;2014(1):CD003344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003344.pub3.