Chan L H, Lee P K, Chan G
Griffith University Nathan Campus, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Glob Public Health. 2009;4(1):1-30. doi: 10.1080/17441690701524471.
Using HIV/AIDS, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and avian influenza as case studies, this paper discusses the processes and dilemmas of China's participation in health governance, both at the domestic level and the global level. Globalization has eroded the boundary between public and private health and between domestic and global health governance. In addition, the SARS outbreak of 2002-2003 focused global attention on China's public health. As a rising power with the largest population on earth, China is expected by the international community to play a better and more active role in health management. Since the turn of this century, China has increasingly embraced multilateralism in health governance. This paper argues that China's multilateral cooperation is driven by both necessity and conscious design. International concerns about good governance and its aspiration to become a 'responsible' state have exerted a normative effect on China to change tack. Its interactions with United Nations agencies have triggered a learning process for China to securitize the spread of infectious diseases as a security threat. Conversely, China has utilized multilateralism to gain access to international resources and technical assistance. It is still a matter of debate whether China's cooperative engagement with global health governance can endure, because of the persistent problems of withholding information on disease outbreaks and because of its insistence on the Westphalian notion of sovereignty.
本文以艾滋病、严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和禽流感为例,探讨了中国在国内和全球层面参与卫生治理的过程及困境。全球化模糊了公共卫生与私人卫生之间以及国内卫生治理与全球卫生治理之间的界限。此外,2002年至2003年的非典疫情使全球聚焦于中国的公共卫生。作为地球上人口最多的新兴大国,国际社会期望中国在卫生管理方面发挥更出色、更积极的作用。自本世纪之交以来,中国在卫生治理方面日益拥抱多边主义。本文认为,中国的多边合作是出于必要性和有意识的谋划。国际社会对善治的关切以及中国自身成为“负责任”国家的愿望,对中国转变策略产生了规范性影响。中国与联合国机构的互动促使中国将传染病传播视为安全威胁并进行安全化处理。反之,中国利用多边主义获取国际资源和技术援助。由于在疾病暴发信息披露方面持续存在问题,以及坚持威斯特伐利亚主权观念,中国与全球卫生治理的合作参与能否持续仍存在争议。