• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于鉴定非眼刺激性化妆品成分的体外分级评估。

An in vitro tier evaluation for the identification of cosmetic ingredients which are not ocular irritants.

作者信息

Hagino Shigenobu, Okazaki Yuuko, Itagaki Hiroshi

机构信息

Shiseido Research Centre, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Altern Lab Anim. 2008 Dec;36(6):641-52. doi: 10.1177/026119290803600608.

DOI:10.1177/026119290803600608
PMID:19154091
Abstract

A tier evaluation system was assessed as an alternative method for the identification of cosmetic ingredients which are not ocular irritants. The system employed monolayer cultures of SIRC cells, an established cell line originally derived from the rabbit cornea, and a three-dimensional living dermal model (LDM), MATREXtrade mark, which consists of human dermal fibroblasts in a contracted collagen lattice. Effects on the cell monolayer cultures were determined by using SIRC cell-Crystal Violet staining (SIRC-CVS), and effects on the LDM were assessed by using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. A non-irritating ingredient was defined as a compound having a maximal average total score (MAS) of 5 or less in the Draize eye test, as this is the criterion used in the Japanese draft guidance for evaluating cosmetic ingredients. Among 34 test substances with known characteristics, 30 were classified accurately. Based on these encouraging results, the possibility of simplifying the MTT assay on the LDM for more-practical use, by selecting only three concentration levels to discriminate non-irritants from irritants, was assessed. The simplified method, involving a three-dose set (the three-dose method), was confirmed as being suitable for the identification of non-irritating ingredients, with triethanolamine used as a negative reference standard. Finally, the LDM was used to evaluate compounds at similar concentrations to those tested in vivo, aiming to predict the concentration at which an ingredient can be formulated into products without causing eye irritation. On the basis of previous validation data and our additional results, it was found that test samples that resulted in a cell viability of 50% or more in this model, could be classified as non-irritating ingredients. In all, these results indicate that the tier evaluation system may be suitable for the evaluation of ingredients intended to be used in cosmetics and medicated cosmetics in Japan.

摘要

评估了一种分级评估系统,作为识别非眼部刺激性化妆品成分的替代方法。该系统采用SIRC细胞的单层培养物(一种最初源自兔角膜的成熟细胞系)和一种三维活体真皮模型(LDM,MATREX商标),其由收缩胶原晶格中的人真皮成纤维细胞组成。通过使用SIRC细胞-结晶紫染色(SIRC-CVS)确定对细胞单层培养物的影响,并通过使用3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)测定法评估对LDM的影响。无刺激性成分被定义为在Draize眼试验中最大平均总分(MAS)为5或更低的化合物,因为这是日本化妆品成分评估草案中使用的标准。在34种具有已知特性的测试物质中,30种被准确分类。基于这些令人鼓舞的结果,评估了通过仅选择三个浓度水平来区分无刺激物和刺激物从而简化LDM上的MTT测定法以使其更具实用性的可能性。涉及三剂量组的简化方法(三剂量法)被确认为适用于识别无刺激性成分,使用三乙醇胺作为阴性参考标准。最后,使用LDM评估与体内测试浓度相似的化合物,旨在预测成分可配制成产品而不引起眼部刺激的浓度。根据先前的验证数据和我们的额外结果,发现在此模型中导致细胞活力达到50%或更高的测试样品可被分类为无刺激性成分。总之,这些结果表明分级评估系统可能适用于评估日本化妆品和药用化妆品中打算使用的成分。

相似文献

1
An in vitro tier evaluation for the identification of cosmetic ingredients which are not ocular irritants.一种用于鉴定非眼刺激性化妆品成分的体外分级评估。
Altern Lab Anim. 2008 Dec;36(6):641-52. doi: 10.1177/026119290803600608.
2
Further verification of an in vitro tier system for the identification of cosmetic ingredients that are not ocular irritants.进一步验证一种体外分层系统,用于鉴定非眼部刺激性的化妆品成分。
Altern Lab Anim. 2010 May;38(2):139-52. doi: 10.1177/026119291003800207.
3
In-house validation of the EpiOcular(TM) eye irritation test and its combination with the bovine corneal opacity and permeability test for the assessment of ocular irritation.EpiOcular(TM)眼刺激性试验的内部验证及其与牛角膜混浊和通透性试验相结合评估眼部刺激性。
Altern Lab Anim. 2011 Sep;39(4):365-87. doi: 10.1177/026119291103900410.
4
Reconstituted human corneal epithelium: a new alternative to the Draize eye test for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals and cosmetic products.重组人角膜上皮:用于评估化学品和化妆品眼部刺激潜力的兔眼刺激试验的新替代方法。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2006 Jun;20(4):499-512. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
5
Performance of porcine corneal opacity and permeability assay to predict eye irritation for water-soluble cosmetic ingredients.猪角膜混浊和通透性试验用于预测水溶性化妆品成分眼刺激性的性能。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2005 Sep;19(6):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.04.006.
6
Evaluation of PREDISAFE, a cell kit for predicting eye irritancy of cosmetic raw materials and formulations.PREDISAFE的评估,一种用于预测化妆品原料和配方眼部刺激性的细胞试剂盒。
Cell Biol Toxicol. 1994 Dec;10(5-6):375-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00755785.
7
Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells.短时间暴露(STE)试验的开发:一种使用SIRC细胞的体外眼刺激试验。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2008 Apr;22(3):760-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.11.018. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
8
Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).欧洲化妆品协会对历史上严重眼损伤/眼刺激体内数据的汇编,这些数据按分类驱动因素进行分析,以支持化学品开发及替代方法/策略评估的化学品选择:德莱兹眼试验参考数据库(DRD)
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Feb;91(2):521-547. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1679-x. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Eye irritation.眼睛刺激。
Altern Lab Anim. 2005 Jul;33 Suppl 1:47-81. doi: 10.1177/026119290503301s09.
10
Final report on the safety assessment of aluminum silicate, calcium silicate, magnesium aluminum silicate, magnesium silicate, magnesium trisilicate, sodium magnesium silicate, zirconium silicate, attapulgite, bentonite, Fuller's earth, hectorite, kaolin, lithium magnesium silicate, lithium magnesium sodium silicate, montmorillonite, pyrophyllite, and zeolite.硅酸铝、硅酸钙、镁铝硅酸盐、硅酸镁、三硅酸镁、硅酸钠镁、硅酸锆、凹凸棒石、膨润土、漂白土、锂蒙脱石、高岭土、锂镁硅酸盐、锂镁硅酸钠、蒙脱石、叶蜡石和沸石安全性评估的最终报告
Int J Toxicol. 2003;22 Suppl 1:37-102.