Clark Daniel L, Connors Bret A, Evan Andrew P, Willis Lynn R, Handa Rajash K, Gao Sujuan
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
BJU Int. 2009 Jun;103(11):1562-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08260.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
OBJECTIVE To determine if the acute renal oxidative stress and inflammation after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), thought to be mediated by ischaemia, is most severe in the portion of the kidney within the focal zone of the lithotripter, and if these effects result primarily from ischaemic injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pigs (7-8-weeks old) received either 2000 shock waves at 24 kV to the lower-pole calyx of one kidney or unilateral renal ischaemia for 1 h. A third group (sham) received no treatment. Timed urine and blood samples were taken for analysis of lipid peroxidation and the inflammatory cytokines, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). At 4 h after treatment, kidneys were removed and samples of cortex and medulla were frozen for analysis of cytokines and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). RESULTS ESWL did not affect urinary excretion of malondialdehyde, but did elicit an eight-fold induction of HO-1 in the portion of the renal medulla within the focal zone of the lithotripter (F2), while remaining unchanged elsewhere in the treated kidney. There was no induction of HO-1 in renal tissue after ischaemia-reperfusion. Urinary excretion of TNF-alpha increased from the lithotripsy-treated kidney by 1 h after treatment, but was unaffected by ischaemia-reperfusion. As with the HO-1 response after lithotripsy, IL-6 increased only in the renal medulla at F2. By contrast, ischaemia-reperfusion increased IL-6 in all samples from the treated kidney. CONCLUSION These findings show that the acute oxidative stress and inflammatory responses to ESWL are localized to the renal medulla at F2. Furthermore, the differing patterns of markers of injury for ESWL and ischaemia-reperfusion suggest that ischaemia is not the principal cause of the injury response after ESWL.
目的 确定体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后急性肾氧化应激和炎症反应(被认为由缺血介导)在碎石机聚焦区内的肾部分是否最为严重,以及这些效应是否主要由缺血性损伤所致。材料与方法 7至8周龄的猪,一侧肾下极肾盏接受24 kV的2000次冲击波治疗,或单侧肾缺血1小时。第三组(假手术组)不接受治疗。定时采集尿液和血液样本,分析脂质过氧化以及炎症细胞因子肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)。治疗后4小时,取出肾脏,将皮质和髓质样本冷冻,用于分析细胞因子和血红素加氧酶-1(HO-1)。结果 ESWL不影响丙二醛的尿排泄,但在碎石机聚焦区内的肾髓质部分(F2)引起HO-1八倍的诱导,而在治疗肾的其他部位保持不变。缺血再灌注后肾组织中未诱导出HO-1。治疗后1小时,经碎石术治疗的肾脏TNF-α尿排泄增加,但不受缺血再灌注影响。与碎石术后HO-1反应一样,IL-6仅在F2的肾髓质中增加。相比之下,缺血再灌注使治疗肾的所有样本中的IL-6增加。结论 这些发现表明,对ESWL的急性氧化应激和炎症反应局限于F2的肾髓质。此外,ESWL和缺血再灌注损伤标志物的不同模式表明,缺血不是ESWL后损伤反应的主要原因。