• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低频体外冲击波碎石术可改善猪模型中肾盂结石的碎裂情况。

Low-frequency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy improves renal pelvic stone disintegration in a pig model.

作者信息

Gillitzer Rolf, Neisius Andreas, Wöllner Jens, Hampel Christian, Brenner Walburgis, Bonilla Arturo Alvarado, Thüroff Joachim

机构信息

Department of Urology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2009 May;103(9):1284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08273.x. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08273.x
PMID:19159409
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare disintegration rates for renal stones treated by 60 vs 120 shock waves (SW)/min at the same energy settings, using standardized validated artificial stones in a pig model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gypsum artificial stones (13 x 6 mm) were inserted into the renal pelvis on either side of 12 anaesthetized pigs by open surgery. Extracorporeal SW lithotripsy (ESWL) was applied using a new electromagnetic lithotripter (Lithoskop, Siemens AG Healthcare, Munich, Germany) at 60 and 120 SW/min; 3000 SW were applied to each kidney with the same energy settings. Stone fragments were collected after nephrectomy, passed through calibrated test sieves, and weighed. Fragment size categories were stratified according to the sieve hole size as set by the manufacturer. Fragments of < or =4.75 mm were defined as capable of spontaneous passage. For each pig the number of stone fragments of the respective size categories was counted and weighed. The results were analysed statistically using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

For fragments of >4.75 mm, the median (range) fragment counts were 0 (0-1) for 60 and 1 (0-3) for 120 SW/min (P = 0.006). For small fragments of 2.0-2.8 mm, the median fragment counts were 15 (4-24) for 60 and 10 (2-25) for 120 SW/min (P = 0.033); for fragments of 1.0-2.0 mm the respective values were 42.5 (9-81) and 21.5 (6-56) (P = 0.004). Of the total stone fragment mass in the 60 and 120 SW/min groups, 4.34% and 31.31% were >4.75 mm. There was complete disintegration yielding fragments capable of spontaneous passage in 10 of 12 renal units at 60 and in three of 12 renal units at 120 SW/min. The mean treatment time was 55.4 min for therapy at 60 and 34.3 min for therapy at 120 SW/min (P = 0.001). One parenchymal haematoma of 15 x 10 mm developed in the 60 SW/min group and another of 20 x 10 mm developed in the 120 SW/min group.

CONCLUSION

ESWL fragmentation with equal energy application yields significantly smaller fragments at 60 than at 120 SW/min. The theoretical stone passage rate could therefore be approximately 80% for 60 vs 25% for 120 SW/min ESWL. Renal haematoma formation was comparable in both groups.

摘要

目的

在猪模型中,使用标准化验证的人工结石,比较在相同能量设置下,每分钟60次与120次冲击波(SW)治疗肾结石的碎石率。

材料与方法

通过开放手术将石膏人工结石(13×6mm)插入12只麻醉猪双侧肾盂。使用新型电磁碎石机(Lithoskop,西门子医疗集团,慕尼黑,德国)以每分钟60次和120次SW进行体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL);在相同能量设置下,对每个肾脏施加3000次SW。肾切除术后收集结石碎片,通过校准的试验筛筛分并称重。根据制造商设定的筛孔尺寸对碎片尺寸类别进行分层。≤4.75mm的碎片定义为能够自然排出。对每只猪,计数并称重各个尺寸类别的结石碎片数量。使用Mann-Whitney U检验对结果进行统计学分析。

结果

对于>4.75mm的碎片,每分钟60次SW时碎片计数中位数(范围)为0(0 - 1),每分钟120次SW时为1(0 - 3)(P = 0.006)。对于2.0 - 2.8mm的小碎片,每分钟60次SW时碎片计数中位数为15(4 - 24),每分钟120次SW时为10(2 - 25)(P = 0.033);对于1.0 - 2.0mm的碎片,相应值分别为42.5(9 - 81)和21.5(6 - 56)(P = 0.004)。在每分钟60次和120次SW组中,总结石碎片质量中>4.75mm的分别占4.34%和31.31%。在每分钟60次SW时,12个肾单位中有10个完全碎裂产生能够自然排出的碎片;在每分钟120次SW时,12个肾单位中有3个。每分钟60次SW治疗平均时间为55.4分钟,每分钟120次SW治疗平均时间为34.3分钟(P = 0.001)。每分钟60次SW组出现1例15×10mm的实质血肿,每分钟120次SW组出现1例20×10mm的实质血肿。

结论

在相同能量应用下,ESWL碎石时,每分钟60次SW产生的碎片明显小于每分钟120次SW。因此,理论上结石排出率对于每分钟60次SW的ESWL约为80%,对于每分钟120次SW的ESWL约为25%。两组肾血肿形成情况相当。

相似文献

1
Low-frequency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy improves renal pelvic stone disintegration in a pig model.低频体外冲击波碎石术可改善猪模型中肾盂结石的碎裂情况。
BJU Int. 2009 May;103(9):1284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08273.x. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
2
Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig.宽焦点、低压力电磁碎石机的独立评估:猪身上未出现肾脏生物效应
BJU Int. 2008 Feb;101(3):382-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07231.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8.
3
Improvement of stone comminution by slow delivery rate of shock waves in extracorporeal lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术中通过缓慢释放冲击波来改善结石粉碎效果。
Int J Urol. 2006 Dec;13(12):1461-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01609.x.
4
Improved cost-effectiveness and efficiency with a slower shockwave delivery rate.降低冲击波发射速率可提高成本效益和效率。
BJU Int. 2010 Mar;105(5):692-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08919.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
5
Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.通过减慢冲击波释放的速率,可显著降低冲击波碎石术期间的肾损伤。
BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):624-7; discussion 627-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07007.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
6
Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations.与其他肾部位置的结石相比,体外冲击波碎石术治疗儿童孤立性下盏结石的疗效。
Urology. 2006 Jan;67(1):170-4; discussion 174-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.061.
7
A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.一种用于治疗尿路结石的新型便携式冲击波碎石机:双焦点碎石机的单中心经验
BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07039.x. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
8
The effect of intracalyceal distribution on the clearance of renal stones of > or = 20 mm in children after extracorporeal lithotripsy.肾盏内分布对儿童体外冲击波碎石术后直径≥20 mm肾结石清除率的影响。
BJU Int. 2004 Apr;93(6):827-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04739.x.
9
Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized study of effectiveness and safety in comparison to standard single-pulse technique.冲击波碎石术同步双脉冲技术的评估:与标准单脉冲技术相比的有效性和安全性前瞻性随机研究。
BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1420-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07357.x. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
10
Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.叶下珠会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效吗?一项随机、前瞻性长期研究。
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1020-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.010.

引用本文的文献

1
[Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].[体外冲击波碎石术]
Urologe A. 2018 Apr;57(4):463-473. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0611-9.
2
How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?我们应如何以及应该如何优化体外冲击波碎石术?
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):3-17. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1020-z. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
3
Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.冲击波碎石术:改善疗效的技术。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1341-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2056-y. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
4
Bubbles with shock waves and ultrasound: a review.冲击波和超声作用下的气泡:综述
Interface Focus. 2015 Oct 6;5(5):20150019. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0019.
5
The histomorphological findings of kidneys after application of high dose and high-energy shock wave lithotripsy.高剂量高能冲击波碎石术后肾脏的组织形态学 findings 。 (注:这里“findings”直接保留英文未翻译,因为不清楚在医学语境中具体准确的中文表述,需结合完整文献进一步确定合适译法)
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(1):72-8. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.01.480. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
6
Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?冲击波碎石术:新的希望?
World J Urol. 2015 Feb;33(2):213-21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1369-3. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
7
Evaluation of contralateral kidney, liver and lung after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in rabbits.兔体外冲击波碎石术后对侧肾、肝、肺的评价。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Oct;41(5):431-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0574-7. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
8
Assessment of a modified acoustic lens for electromagnetic shock wave lithotripters in a swine model.评估改良声透镜在猪模型中对电磁冲击波碎石机的影响。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):1096-101. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.074. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.关于如何进行体外冲击波碎石术以达到最大效果的各个方面。
Urol Res. 2012 Oct;40(5):433-46. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0485-z. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
Shock wave technology and application: an update.冲击波技术及应用:最新进展。
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):784-96. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.033. Epub 2011 Feb 23.