De Luca Assunta, Toni Danilo, Lauria Laura, Sacchetti Maria Luisa, Giorgi Rossi Paolo, Ferri Marica, Puca Emanuele, Prencipe Massimiliano, Guasticchi Gabriella
Public Health Agency of the Latium Region, Rome, Italy.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jan 21;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-14.
Emergency Clinical Pathways (ECP) for stroke have never been tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
To evaluate the effectiveness of an ECP for stroke patients in Latium (Italy) emergency system.
cluster-RCT designed to compare stroke patient referrals by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) and Emergency Room (ER) health professionals trained in the ECP, with those of non-trained EMS and ER controls. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible (aged </= 80 and symptom onset </= 6 hours) stroke patients referred to a stroke unit (SU). Intention to treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed, and risk ratios (RR) adjusted by age, gender and area, were calculated.
2656 patients in the intervention arm and 2239 in the control arm required assistance; 78.3% of the former and 80.6% of the latter were admitted to hospitals, and respectively 74.8% and 78.3% were confirmed strokes. Of the eligible confirmed strokes, 106/434 (24.4%) in the intervention arm and 43/328 (13.1%) in the control arm were referred to the SU in the ITT analysis (RR = 2.01; 95% CI: 0.79-4.00), and respectively 105/243 (43.2%) and 43/311 (13.8%) in the PP analysis (RR = 3.21; 95%CI: 1.62-4.98). Of patients suitable for i.v. thrombolysis, 15/175 (8.6%) in the intervention arm and 2/115 (1.7%) in the control arm received thrombolysis (p = 0.02) in the ITT analysis, and respectively 15/99 (15.1%) and 2/107 (1.9%)(p = 0.001) in the PP analysis.
Our data suggest potenti efficiency and feasibility of an ECP. The integration of EMS and ERs with SU networks for organised acute stroke care is feasible and may ameliorate the quality of care for stroke patients.
Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN41456865).
卒中的急诊临床路径(ECP)从未在随机对照试验(RCT)中进行过测试。
评估ECP对意大利拉齐奥地区急诊系统中卒中患者的有效性。
采用整群随机对照试验,比较接受ECP培训的紧急医疗服务(EMS)和急诊室(ER)医护人员转诊的卒中患者与未接受培训的EMS和ER对照组转诊的卒中患者。主要结局指标是转诊至卒中单元(SU)的符合条件(年龄≤80岁且症状发作≤6小时)的卒中患者比例。进行意向性分析(ITT)和符合方案分析(PP),并计算按年龄、性别和地区调整的风险比(RR)。
干预组有2656例患者、对照组有2239例患者需要救助;前者78.3%、后者80.6%入院,确诊为卒中的分别占74.8%和78.3%。在ITT分析中,干预组符合条件的确诊卒中患者中有106/434(24.4%)、对照组中有43/328(13.1%)被转诊至SU(RR = 2.01;95%CI:0.79 - 4.00),在PP分析中分别为105/243(43.2%)和43/311(13.8%)(RR = 3.21;95%CI:1.62 - 4.98)。在适合静脉溶栓的患者中,ITT分析显示干预组有15/175(8.6%)、对照组有2/115(1.7%)接受了溶栓治疗(p = 0.02),PP分析中分别为15/99(15.1%)和2/107(1.9%)(p = 0.001)。
我们的数据表明ECP具有潜在的有效性和可行性。将EMS和ER与SU网络整合以进行有组织的急性卒中护理是可行的,并且可能改善卒中患者的护理质量。
当前受控试验(ISRCTN41456865)。