Suppr超能文献

本科护理课程中临终关怀内容的整合:学生的知识与认知

Integration of end-of-life care content in undergraduate nursing curricula: student knowledge and perceptions.

作者信息

Wallace Meredith, Grossman Sheila, Campbell Suzanne, Robert Tracey, Lange Jean, Shea Joyce

机构信息

Yale University School of Nursing, New Haven, CT 06536-0740, USA.

出版信息

J Prof Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;25(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2008.08.003.

Abstract

Studies indicate that nurses spend more time with patients at the end of life than any other health care discipline (K. M. Foley & H. Gelband, 2003). So it is imperative that nurses be educated so they can provide this high-quality end-of-life care. The purpose of this project was to provide a current state of end-of-life nursing education in the literature and to report on end-of-life knowledge and experiences of two groups of nursing students in one small, liberal arts university. A total of 111 undergraduate students (61 sophomores and 50 seniors) were administered a 50-item, multiple-choice test to determine their baseline knowledge about end-of-life care. Sophomore scores ranged from 20% to 86% with a mean of 60.98 (SD = 11.83). Senior pretest scores ranged from 70% to 96% with a mean of 83.26 (SD = 6.6). An independent samples t test was conducted to determine if there was a difference in group mean knowledge between sophomore and senior students. Levene's test for equality of variance was significant (F = 4.22, P < .05); thus, a t test with equal variance assumed revealed a significant difference between sophomore and senior group means (t = -10.44, P < .001). The review of literature and student knowledge and experience assessment resulted in the development of a model of end-of-life curriculum integration implemented at the university and sets the stage for future program evaluation studies.

摘要

研究表明,在临终阶段,护士陪伴患者的时间比其他任何医疗保健专业人员都要多(K.M.福利和H.格尔班德,2003年)。因此,对护士进行相关教育至关重要,这样他们才能提供高质量的临终护理。本项目的目的是呈现文献中临终护理教育的现状,并报告一所小型文科大学中两组护理专业学生的临终知识和经历。共有111名本科生(61名大二学生和50名大四学生)接受了一项包含50道选择题的测试,以确定他们关于临终护理的基线知识。大二学生的得分在20%至86%之间,平均分为60.98(标准差 = 11.83)。大四学生的预测试得分在70%至96%之间,平均分为83.26(标准差 = 6.6)。进行了独立样本t检验,以确定大二和大四学生在组平均知识水平上是否存在差异。方差齐性的Levene检验具有显著性(F = 4.22,P < .05);因此,采用等方差假设的t检验显示大二和大四学生组的平均分存在显著差异(t = -10.44,P < .001)。对文献的综述以及对学生知识和经历的评估促成了该大学实施的临终课程整合模型的开发,并为未来的项目评估研究奠定了基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验