Zhou Biao, Chen Kun, Wang Jun-fang, Wu Yin-yin, Zheng Wei-jun, Wang Hui
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Dec;29(12):1193-8.
To evaluate the validity and reliability of a Chinese version on the Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36) among elderly population.
Questionnaire including SF-36 Chinese version was administered in a cross-sectional study from October to December 2007. 4241 elderly people over 60 years old from rural and urban area in Zhejiang province were face-to-face interviewed by well-trained investigators, and then analyses on correlation, reliability, factors, t-test and one-way ANOVA were made to evaluate on reliability and validity of the scale.
The SF-36 Chinese version had good split-half reliability (r = 0.91, P < 0.001) and all the internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficients exceeded 0.8 except for VT (alpha = 0.65), SF (alpha = 0.65) and MH (alpha = 0.40). The correlative coefficients between each item and its domain were all greater than the 0.4 thresholds except item 9 - 2, and they were greater than the correlation between the item and other domains for all but item 9 - 8. These results demonstrated that the SF-36 Chinese version had good convergent validity and discriminant validity. The distribution of 35 items in 6 public factors (the cumulative variance = 67.04%) extracted from them was consistent with the basic conceived concept. All domains except MH had good validity to discriminate different categories.
The SF-36 Chinese version had good reliability and validity. It was acceptable for the evaluation on quality of life in elderly population, but the reliability and validity of MH were relative low and the items such as 9 - 2, 9 - 8 in MH and 3 - 1 in PF were not suitable for Chinese elderly population.
评估中文版简明健康调查量表(SF-36)在老年人群中的有效性和可靠性。
在2007年10月至12月的一项横断面研究中发放包含中文版SF-36的问卷。来自浙江省城乡地区的4241名60岁以上老年人由训练有素的调查员进行面对面访谈,然后进行相关性、可靠性、因子分析、t检验和单因素方差分析,以评估该量表的可靠性和有效性。
中文版SF-36具有良好的分半信度(r = 0.91,P < 0.001),除活力(VT,α = 0.65)、社会功能(SF,α = 0.65)和精神健康(MH,α = 0.40)外,所有内部一致性Cronbach's α系数均超过0.8。除条目9-2外,各条目与其领域之间的相关系数均大于0.4阈值,且除条目9-8外,所有条目的相关系数均大于该条目与其他领域之间的相关性。这些结果表明中文版SF-36具有良好的收敛效度和区分效度。从其中提取的6个公共因子(累积方差 = 67.04%)中35个条目的分布与基本构想概念一致。除MH外,所有领域在区分不同类别方面均具有良好的效度。
中文版SF-36具有良好的可靠性和有效性。它可用于评估老年人群的生活质量,但MH的可靠性和有效性相对较低,且MH中的条目9-2、9-8以及生理功能(PF)中的条目3-1不适用于中国老年人群。