• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同医院间经入院严重程度调整后的医院死亡率和发病率差异。

Interhospital variations in admission severity-adjusted hospital mortality and morbidity.

作者信息

Bradbury R C, Stearns F E, Steen P M

机构信息

Master of Health Administration Program, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1991 Oct;26(4):407-24.

PMID:1917499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1069834/
Abstract

In this study hospital admissions are categorized into admission severity groups based on key clinical findings. Severity of illness is determined again later in the hospital stay after treatment has been initiated. High severity on this second review is labeled major morbidity or morbidity, depending on the severity level, and these rates serve as a health outcome indicator along with in-hospital mortality. This study's findings show, for ten hospitals randomly selected from MedisGroups users, considerable interhospital variation in standardized mortality and morbidity ratios for ten frequently occurring DRGs on the adult medical service. After adjusting for admission severity and case mix, three of the ten study hospitals have a statistically significant (p less than .01) difference between the hospital's standardized mortality ratio and 1.0. Such a significant difference exists for the standardized major morbidity ratio of four hospitals and for the standardized morbidity ratio of three hospitals. At the DRG-specific level, our results show that 8.9 percent, 4.4 percent, and 15.0 percent of the hospital-specific mortality, major morbidity, and morbidity ratios, respectively, are statistically significant. Most hospital outliers have fewer deaths or morbid cases than expected. We caution that the study hospitals may not be representative of a larger group of U.S. hospitals.

摘要

在本研究中,根据关键临床发现将医院入院病例分为不同的入院严重程度组。在开始治疗后的住院期间,再次确定疾病的严重程度。根据严重程度,第二次评估中的高严重程度被标记为主要发病率或发病率,这些比率与住院死亡率一起作为健康结果指标。本研究结果显示,从MedisGroups用户中随机选择的十家医院,成人医疗服务中十种常见诊断相关分组(DRG)的标准化死亡率和发病率在医院间存在相当大的差异。在调整入院严重程度和病例组合后,十家研究医院中有三家医院的标准化死亡率与1.0之间存在统计学显著差异(p小于0.01)。四家医院的标准化主要发病率和三家医院的标准化发病率存在这种显著差异。在特定DRG水平上,我们的结果显示,各医院特定的死亡率、主要发病率和发病率比率分别有8.9%、4.4%和15.0%具有统计学显著性。大多数医院的异常值死亡或发病病例比预期的少。我们提醒,研究中的医院可能不代表美国更大范围的医院群体。

相似文献

1
Interhospital variations in admission severity-adjusted hospital mortality and morbidity.不同医院间经入院严重程度调整后的医院死亡率和发病率差异。
Health Serv Res. 1991 Oct;26(4):407-24.
2
Inter-hospital mortality and morbidity variation in Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州医院间死亡率和发病率的差异
J Soc Health Syst. 1993;4(1):48-67.
3
Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.使用所有患者细化诊断相关组进行临床重新设计。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):965-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0650.
4
Outcome following fractured neck of femur--variation in acute hospital care or case mix?股骨颈骨折后的结局——急性医院护理的差异还是病例组合的差异?
J Public Health Med. 1995 Dec;17(4):429-37.
5
Admission volume determines outcome for patients with acute pancreatitis.入院量决定急性胰腺炎患者的预后。
Gastroenterology. 2009 Dec;137(6):1995-2001. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.056. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
6
Relating hospital health outcomes and resource expenditures.关联医院的健康结果与资源支出。
Inquiry. 1994 Spring;31(1):56-65.
7
Impact of a DRG-based hospital financing system on quality and outcomes of care in Italy.基于诊断相关分组的医院融资系统对意大利医疗质量和治疗结果的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):405-15.
8
Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.入院时存在指标对医院质量评估的影响:医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)住院患者质量指标的经验
Med Care. 2008 Feb;46(2):112-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318158aed6.
9
Comparing low-severity hospital admissions in IPA HMOs and indemnity-type programs.比较IPA健康维护组织和赔偿型保险计划中低严重程度的住院情况。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1993 Spring;38(1):45-61.
10
[Social class, mode of admission, severity of illness and hospital mortality: an analysis with "All patient refined DRG" of discharges from the Molinette hospital in Turin].[社会阶层、入院方式、疾病严重程度与医院死亡率:对都灵莫利内特医院出院病例采用“所有患者精细化疾病诊断相关分组”进行的分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 1999 Jul-Sep;23(3):188-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse-staffing level and quality of acute care services: Evidence from cross-national panel data analysis in OECD countries.护士人员配备水平与急性护理服务质量:来自经合组织国家跨国面板数据分析的证据。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Dec 5;6(1):6-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.11.010. eCollection 2019 Jan 10.
2
Hospital characteristics, clinical severity, and outcomes for surgical oncology patients.外科肿瘤患者的医院特征、临床严重程度和结局。
Surgery. 2010 May;147(5):602-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.014.
3
Demographic profile and outcome analysis of a tertiary level pediatric intensive care unit.三级儿科重症监护病房的人口统计学特征及结局分析
Indian J Pediatr. 2004 Jul;71(7):587-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02724117.
4
Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data.利用常规收集的数据解释英国医院死亡率的差异。
BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1515-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1515.
5
Comparing healthcare outcomes.比较医疗保健结果。
BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1493-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1493.

本文引用的文献

1
Classifying severity of illness by using clinical findings.通过临床检查结果对疾病严重程度进行分类。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1984;Suppl(Suppl):107-8.
2
Organizing for quality competition: the coming paradigm shift.为质量竞争而组织:即将到来的范式转变。
Front Health Serv Manage. 1989 Summer;5(4):4-30.
3
Severity-of-illness measurement: applications in quality assurance and utilization review.
Med Care Rev. 1988 Fall;45(2):339-66. doi: 10.1177/107755878804500206.
4
The Joint Commission looks to the future.联合委员会展望未来。
JAMA. 1987 Aug 21;258(7):951-2.
5
The quality of medical evidence: implications for quality of care.医学证据的质量:对医疗质量的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1988 Spring;7(1):19-32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.7.1.19.
6
A clinical assessment of MedisGroups.对MedisGroups的临床评估。
JAMA. 1988 Dec 2;260(21):3159-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.21.3159.
7
Refining case-mix adjustment. The research evidence.优化病例组合调整。研究证据。
N Engl J Med. 1987 Sep 10;317(11):679-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198709103171106.
8
Adjusted hospital death rates: a potential screen for quality of medical care.调整后的医院死亡率:医疗质量的潜在筛查指标。
Am J Public Health. 1987 Sep;77(9):1162-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.9.1162.
9
Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbidities.根据出院数据评估医院相关死亡情况。住院时间和合并症的作用。
JAMA. 1988 Oct 21;260(15):2240-6.
10
Differences among hospitals in Medicare patient mortality.医疗保险患者死亡率在不同医院之间的差异。
Health Serv Res. 1989 Apr;24(1):1-31.