• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于衡量对长期护理和临终关怀的满意度及偏好的量表的开发。

Development of scales to measure satisfaction and preferences regarding long-term and terminal care.

作者信息

McCusker J

出版信息

Med Care. 1984 May;22(5):476-93. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198405000-00011.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198405000-00011
PMID:6425580
Abstract

This report describes efforts to develop and test scales for measuring attitudes toward the medical care of chronically and terminally ill patients and their families. The following satisfaction scales were developed: General Satisfaction, Availability of Care, Continuity of Care, Physician Availability, Physician Competence, Personal Qualities of Physician, Communication with Physician, Involvement of Patient and Family in Treatment Decisions, Freedom from Pain, and Pain Control. Preference scales were developed to measure preference for home care and preference for physician decisions. These scales were tested in two independent study samples: Home Care Study subjects--patients and their caretakers enrolled in a trial to evaluate a new method of home care for chronically and terminally ill homebound patients; and Terminal Care Study subjects--surviving relatives of a random sample of cancer patients who died. The internal consistency, discriminant validity, and convergent validity of each scale were assessed by means of item-total correlations, Cronbach 's alpha, and comparison with other questionnaire items. The results supported the use of several scales in their original form. Recommendations are made for appropriate modifications in the remaining scales.

摘要

本报告描述了开发和测试用于衡量对慢性病患者、晚期患者及其家属医疗护理态度的量表的工作。开发了以下满意度量表:总体满意度、护理可及性、护理连续性、医生可及性、医生能力、医生个人品质、与医生的沟通、患者及家属参与治疗决策、免于疼痛和疼痛控制。还开发了偏好量表来衡量对居家护理的偏好以及对医生决策的偏好。这些量表在两个独立的研究样本中进行了测试:居家护理研究对象——参加评估针对居家慢性病患者和晚期患者新居家护理方法试验的患者及其护理人员;以及临终护理研究对象——随机抽取的已故癌症患者的在世亲属。通过项目-总分相关性、克朗巴哈系数α以及与其他问卷项目的比较,对每个量表的内部一致性、区分效度和聚合效度进行了评估。结果支持以原始形式使用几个量表。针对其余量表提出了适当修改的建议。

相似文献

1
Development of scales to measure satisfaction and preferences regarding long-term and terminal care.用于衡量对长期护理和临终关怀的满意度及偏好的量表的开发。
Med Care. 1984 May;22(5):476-93. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198405000-00011.
2
Meaninglessness in terminally ill cancer patients: a validation study and nurse education intervention trial.晚期癌症患者的无意义感:一项验证性研究及护士教育干预试验
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Aug;34(2):160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.021. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
3
Nurse-physician collaboration in pain management for terminally ill cancer patients treated at home in Japan.日本居家治疗的晚期癌症患者疼痛管理中的护士与医生协作。
J Palliat Care. 2007 Winter;23(4):255-61.
4
Audit of terminal care in a general practice.综合医疗中临终关怀的审计
BMJ. 1990 Apr 14;300(6730):983-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6730.983.
5
Development and validation of scales for attitudes, self-reported practices, difficulties and knowledge among home care nurses providing palliative care.为提供姑息治疗的家庭护理护士开发并验证关于态度、自我报告行为、困难及知识的量表。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Jun;22:8-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
The use of home care in terminal cancer.晚期癌症患者的居家护理应用
Am J Prev Med. 1985 Mar-Apr;1(2):42-52.
7
Quality of terminal care: salient indicators identified by families.临终关怀质量:家庭确定的显著指标。
J Palliat Care. 1989 Mar;5(1):21-30.
8
Measuring satisfaction with health care: a comparison of single with paired rating strategies.
Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90306-7.
9
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
10
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.

引用本文的文献

1
Delivery of intravenous anti-cancer therapy at home versus in hospital or community settings for adults with cancer.成年癌症患者在家中与在医院或社区环境中接受静脉抗癌治疗的情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD014861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014861.pub2.
2
Assessing Patient Satisfaction: Using the Radiation Oncology Patient Satisfaction [ROPS] Questionnaire in a Private Practice Setting.评估患者满意度:在私人诊所环境中使用放射肿瘤学患者满意度[ROPS]问卷
Health Serv Insights. 2022 Aug 12;15:11786329221118241. doi: 10.1177/11786329221118241. eCollection 2022.
3
Tools Measuring Quality of Death, Dying, and Care, Completed after Death: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.
衡量死亡、临终和死亡后护理质量的工具:系统评价心理测量特性。
Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):183-197. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0328-2.
4
Use of an Item Bank to Develop Two Short-Form FAMCARE Scales to Measure Family Satisfaction With Care in the Setting of Serious Illness.使用题库开发两个简版FAMCARE量表,以衡量重病背景下家庭对护理的满意度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):894-903.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
5
Improving the care of children with advanced cancer by using an electronic patient-reported feedback intervention: results from the PediQUEST randomized controlled trial.利用电子患者报告反馈干预措施改善晚期癌症儿童的护理:来自 PediQUEST 随机对照试验的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 10;32(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.5981. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
6
Performance of the Family Satisfaction with the End-of-Life Care (FAMCARE) measure in an ethnically diverse cohort: psychometric analyses using item response theory.在一个种族多样化的队列中,使用项目反应理论对家庭对临终关怀满意度(FAMCARE)测量的表现进行心理计量学分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Feb;22(2):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1988-z. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对晚期疾病成人患者及其照护者的居家姑息治疗服务的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD007760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007760.pub2.
8
Factors associated with nonresponse to a computer-tailored asthma management program for urban adolescents with asthma.与城市哮喘青少年对计算机定制哮喘管理项目无反应相关的因素。
J Asthma. 2010 Aug;47(6):667-73. doi: 10.3109/02770900903518827.
9
Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.癌症护理中患者需求评估:评估工具综述
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Oct;15(10):1125-44. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0205-8. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
10
An evaluation framework for a rural home-based telerehabilitation network.农村居家远程康复网络评估框架
J Med Syst. 2005 Dec;29(6):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s10916-005-6127-z.