Moran K A, McGrath T, Marshall B M, Wallace E S
School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Sports Med. 2009 Feb;30(2):113-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103303. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of dynamic stretching, static stretching and no stretching, as part of a general warm-up, on golf swing performance with a five-iron. Measures of performance were taken 0 min, 5 min, 15 min and 30 min after stretching. Dynamic stretching produced significantly greater club head speeds than both static stretching (Delta=1.9m.s (-1); p=0.000) and no stretching (Delta=1.7 m.s (-1); p=0.000), and greater ball speeds than both static stretching (Delta=3.5m.s (-1); p=0.003) and no stretching (Delta=3.3m.s (-1); p=0.001). Dynamic stretching produced significantly straighter swing-paths than both static stretching (Delta=-0.61 degrees , p=0.000) and no stretching (Delta=-0.72 degrees , p=0.01). Dynamic stretching also produced more central impact points than the static stretch (Delta=0.7 cm, p=0.001). For the club face angle, there was no effect of either stretch or time. For all of the variables measured, there was no significant difference between the static stretch and no stretch conditions. All of the results were unaffected by the time of measurement after stretching. The results indicate that dynamic stretching should be used as part of a general warm-up in golf.
本研究的目的是检验作为一般热身运动一部分的动态拉伸、静态拉伸和不拉伸对五号铁头球杆高尔夫挥杆表现的影响。在拉伸后0分钟、5分钟、15分钟和30分钟进行表现测量。动态拉伸产生的杆头速度显著高于静态拉伸(差值=1.9米/秒;p=0.000)和不拉伸(差值=1.7米/秒;p=0.000),球速也高于静态拉伸(差值=3.5米/秒;p=0.003)和不拉伸(差值=3.3米/秒;p=0.001)。动态拉伸产生的挥杆路径比静态拉伸(差值=-0.61度,p=0.000)和不拉伸(差值=-0.72度,p=0.01)更直。动态拉伸产生的击球点也比静态拉伸更靠近中心(差值=0.7厘米,p=0.001)。对于杆面角度,拉伸和时间均无影响。对于所有测量变量,静态拉伸和不拉伸条件之间没有显著差异。所有结果在拉伸后的测量时间上均未受影响。结果表明,动态拉伸应作为高尔夫一般热身运动的一部分使用。