Papoutsi Marina, de Zwart Jacco A, Jansma J Martijn, Pickering Martin J, Bednar James A, Horwitz Barry
Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Sep;19(9):2156-65. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn239. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the neuroanatomical substrates of phonetic encoding and the generation of articulatory codes from phonological representations. Our focus was on the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and in particular whether the LIFG plays a role in sublexical phonological processing such as syllabification or whether it is directly involved in phonetic encoding and the generation of articulatory codes. To answer this question, we contrasted the brain activation patterns elicited by pseudowords with high- or low-sublexical frequency components, which we expected would reveal areas related to the generation of articulatory codes but not areas related to phonological encoding. We found significant activation of a premotor network consisting of the dorsal precentral gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, and the supplementary motor area for low- versus high-sublexical frequency pseudowords. Based on our hypothesis, we concluded that these areas and in particular the LIFG are involved in phonetic and not phonological encoding. We further discuss our findings with respect to the mechanisms of phonetic encoding and provide evidence in support of a functional segregation of the posterior part of Broca's area, the pars opercularis.
我们使用事件相关功能磁共振成像来研究语音编码的神经解剖学基础以及从语音表征生成发音代码的过程。我们关注的是左侧额下回(LIFG)的作用,特别是LIFG是否在诸如音节划分等次词汇语音处理中发挥作用,或者它是否直接参与语音编码和发音代码的生成。为了回答这个问题,我们对比了由具有高或低次词汇频率成分的假词引发的大脑激活模式,我们预期这将揭示与发音代码生成相关的区域,而不是与语音编码相关的区域。我们发现,对于低次词汇频率与高次词汇频率的假词,由背侧中央前回、双侧额下回和辅助运动区组成的一个运动前网络有显著激活。基于我们的假设,我们得出结论,这些区域,特别是LIFG,参与的是语音而非语音编码。我们进一步就语音编码机制讨论了我们的发现,并提供证据支持布罗卡区后部即岛盖部的功能分离。