Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom; Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 15;245:118734. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118734. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
Controversy surrounds the interpretation of higher activation for pseudoword compared to word reading in the left precentral gyrus and pars opercularis. Specifically, does activation in these regions reflect: (1) the demands on sublexical assembly of articulatory codes, or (2) retrieval effort because the combinations of articulatory codes are unfamiliar? Using fMRI, in 84 neurologically intact participants, we addressed this issue by comparing reading and repetition of words (W) and pseudowords (P) to naming objects (O) from pictures or sounds. As objects do not provide sublexical articulatory cues, we hypothesis that retrieval effort will be greater for object naming than word repetition/reading (which benefits from both lexical and sublexical cues); while the demands on sublexical assembly will be higher for pseudoword production than object naming. We found that activation was: (i) highest for pseudoword reading [P>O&W in the visual modality] in the anterior part of the ventral precentral gyrus bordering the precentral sulcus (vPCg/vPCs), consistent with the sublexical assembly of articulatory codes; but (ii) as high for object naming as pseudoword production [P&O>W] in dorsal precentral gyrus (dPCg) and the left inferior frontal junction (IFJ), consistent with retrieval demands and cognitive control. In addition, we dissociate the response properties of vPCg/vPCs, dPCg and IFJ from other left frontal lobe regions that are activated during single word speech production. Specifically, in both auditory and visual modalities: a central part of vPCg (head and face area) was more activated for verbal than nonverbal stimuli [P&W>O]; and the pars orbitalis and inferior frontal sulcus were most activated during object naming [O>W&P]. Our findings help to resolve a previous discrepancy in the literature, dissociate three functionally distinct parts of the precentral gyrus, and refine our knowledge of the functional anatomy of speech production in the left frontal lobe.
在左中央前回和额下回的优势,对于假词阅读比单词阅读的解释存在争议。具体来说,这些区域的激活是否反映了:(1)对音位代码亚词汇组装的要求,或者(2)由于发音代码的组合不熟悉而导致的检索努力?使用 fMRI,我们在 84 名神经完整的参与者中比较了阅读和重复单词(W)和假词(P)与从图片或声音命名物体(O)的情况,以解决这个问题。由于物体不提供亚词汇发音线索,我们假设与单词重复/阅读(受益于词汇和亚词汇线索)相比,物体命名的检索努力更大;而假词产生的亚词汇组装要求更高。我们发现激活程度最高的是:(i)在腹侧中央前回的前部分,靠近中央前沟(vPCg/vPCs),对发音代码的亚词汇组装要求较高[P>O&W 在视觉模式下],这与发音代码的亚词汇组装一致;但是(ii)在背侧中央前回(dPCg)和左侧下额前联合(IFJ)中与假词产生一样高[P&O>W],这与检索需求和认知控制一致。此外,我们将 vPCg/vPCs、dPCg 和 IFJ 的反应特性与在单个单词言语产生过程中被激活的其他左额叶区域区分开来。具体来说,在听觉和视觉两种模态中:vPCg 的中心部分(头和脸区域)对言语刺激比非言语刺激更活跃[P&W>O];而眶额回和下额前沟在物体命名时最活跃[O>W&P]。我们的发现有助于解决文献中的一个先前差异,将中央前回的三个功能上不同的部分区分开来,并细化我们对左侧额叶言语产生的功能解剖学的认识。