Steininger C, Redlberger M, Graninger W, Kundi M, Popow-Kraupp T
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Mar;15(3):267-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02674.x. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
Rapid and reliable diagnosis of influenza is essential for identification of contagious patients and effective patient management. Near-patient assays allow establishment of the diagnosis within minutes in young children, and this study aimed to evaluate near-patient assays in relation to the patient's age. A total of 194 patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza A/H3N2 virus infection, diagnosed within a prospective cohort study, were included. Cryopreserved nasopharyngeal swabs collected from these patients were tested by four near-patient assays (Binax Now Influenza A&B, Quick S-Influ A/B, Influ-A&B Respi-Strip, and Actim Influenza A&B). The main outcome measure was sensitivity of the near-patient assays in relation to the age of patients. The Binax Now, Quick S-Influ, Influ-A&B Respi-Strip and Actim assays had overall sensitivities of 19%, 18%, 26%, and 40%, respectively. The estimated sensitivity for influenza A/H3N2 virus detection in nasopharyngeal swabs was 17-56% in children 1 year of age and decreased to 8-22% in patients 80 years of age (logistic regression). The sensitivity of the Influ-A&B Respi-Strip and Actim assays decreased significantly with increasing age (p 0.014 and p 0.033, respectively (logistic regression)), a trend for decrease was observed for the Binax Now assay (p 0.074 (logistic regression)), and the low sensitivity of the Quick S-Influ assay was similar in children and adults. Less than one-fourth of diagnosed influenza A/H3N2 virus infections can be identified in elderly patients using a near-patient assay. Consequently, near-patient assays are of limited value for confirming the diagnosis when influenza is clinically suspected in adults. Antiviral therapy and additional diagnostic procedures cannot be withheld on the basis of a negative near-patient assay result, particularly in adult patients.
快速、可靠地诊断流感对于识别具有传染性的患者以及有效地管理患者至关重要。即时检验可在数分钟内为幼儿确诊,本研究旨在评估即时检验与患者年龄的关系。研究纳入了在前瞻性队列研究中确诊的194例实验室确诊的甲型H3N2流感病毒感染患者。用四种即时检验方法(Binax Now甲型和乙型流感、Quick S-流感A/B、Influ-A&B呼吸检测试纸条和Actim甲型和乙型流感)对从这些患者采集的冻存鼻咽拭子进行检测。主要观察指标是即时检验方法相对于患者年龄的敏感性。Binax Now、Quick S-流感、Influ-A&B呼吸检测试纸条和Actim检验的总体敏感性分别为19%、18%、26%和40%。在1岁儿童中,鼻咽拭子检测甲型H3N2流感病毒的估计敏感性为17%-56%,在80岁患者中降至8%-22%(逻辑回归)。Influ-A&B呼吸检测试纸条和Actim检验的敏感性随年龄增长显著降低(分别为p = 0.014和p = 0.033(逻辑回归)),Binax Now检验观察到下降趋势(p = 0.074(逻辑回归)),Quick S-流感检验在儿童和成人中的低敏感性相似。使用即时检验方法在老年患者中识别出的确诊甲型H3N2流感病毒感染病例不到四分之一。因此,当临床上怀疑成人患有流感时,即时检验对于确诊的价值有限。不能基于即时检验结果为阴性而不给予抗病毒治疗和其他诊断程序,特别是对于成年患者。