Radolovich Danila K, Czosnyka Marek, Timofeev Ivan, Lavinio Andrea, Hutchinson Peter, Gupta Arun, Pickard John D, Smielewski Peter
Academic Neurosurgical Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, P.O. Box 167, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK.
Neurocrit Care. 2009;10(3):274-9. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9190-3. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
It has been reported recently that correlation between brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) may serve as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. We aimed to compare similar indices describing interaction between changes in intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP), and brain tissue oxygen to verify their clinical utility in patients after traumatic brain injury.
Retrospective analysis of multimodal monitoring of 32 patients suffering from head injury, admitted in the Neurosciences Critical Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. Initial 24 h intervals of continuous ABP, ICP, and PbtO2 recordings were analyzed. Index of tissue oxygen reactivity ORx was evaluated as the correlation coefficient between PbtO2 and CPP over a period of 60 min and compared to the index of pressure reactivity PRx. "Optimal CPP" and a hypothetical "optimal PbtO2" were defined as the ranges of CPP and PbtO2 at which PRx or ORx were indicating best cerebrovascular milieu.
PRx and ORx mean values did not show any correlation with each other (R = 0.012; P = 0.95) between patients. There was also no correlation between ORx and PbtO2 (R = 0.098; P = 0.61) and between PRx and PbtO2 (R = 0.019; P = 0.923). No clear and consistent value of "optimal CPP" minimizing ORx or of hypothetical "optimal PbtO2" were found analyzing PbtO2 or ORx trend over the 24 h of monitoring. However, in most of patients 'optimal CPP' has been found for PRx index. The same has been confirmed when the data from whole monitoring period were analyzed. There was no correlation between values of 'optimal CPP' assessed using ORx and 'optimal CPP' assessed with PRx.
The relationships between PbtO2, ORx, and CPP in head injury appear less useful than reported before for patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
最近有报道称,脑组织氧分压(PbtO2)与脑灌注压(CPP)之间的相关性可作为蛛网膜下腔出血后脑自动调节的一个指标。我们旨在比较描述颅内压(ICP)、动脉血压(ABP)和脑组织氧变化之间相互作用的类似指标,以验证其在创伤性脑损伤患者中的临床应用价值。
对英国剑桥阿登布鲁克医院神经科学重症监护病房收治的32例头部受伤患者的多模式监测进行回顾性分析。分析连续ABP、ICP和PbtO2记录的最初24小时间隔。组织氧反应性指数ORx被评估为60分钟内PbtO2与CPP之间的相关系数,并与压力反应性指数PRx进行比较。“最佳CPP”和假设的“最佳PbtO2”被定义为PRx或ORx显示最佳脑血管环境时的CPP和PbtO2范围。
患者之间PRx和ORx的平均值彼此之间没有显示出任何相关性(R = 0.012;P = 0.95)。ORx与PbtO2之间(R = 0.098;P = 0.61)以及PRx与PbtO2之间(R = 0.019;P = 0.923)也没有相关性。在监测的24小时内分析PbtO2或ORx趋势时,未发现使ORx最小化的“最佳CPP”或假设的“最佳PbtO2”的明确且一致的值。然而,在大多数患者中,PRx指数找到了“最佳CPP”。对整个监测期的数据进行分析时也证实了这一点。使用ORx评估的“最佳CPP”值与使用PRx评估的“最佳CPP”值之间没有相关性。
对于创伤性脑损伤患者,PbtO2、ORx和CPP之间的关系似乎不如之前报道的蛛网膜下腔出血患者那样有用。