Lang Erhard W, Kasprowicz Magdalena, Smielewski Peter, Pickard John, Czosnyka Marek
Neurosurgical Associates, Red Cross Hospital, Bergmannstrasse 30, 34121, Kassel, Germany,
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0074-9.
Plateau waves in intracranial pressure (ICP) are frequently recorded in neuro intensive care and are not yet fully understood. To further investigate this phenomenon, we analyzed partial pressure of cerebral oxygen (pbtO2) and a moving correlation coefficient between ICP and mean arterial blood pressure (ABP), called PRx, along with the cerebral oxygen reactivity index (ORx), which is a moving correlation coefficient between cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and pbtO2 in an observational study.
We analyzed 55 plateau waves in 20 patients after severe traumatic brain injury. We calculated ABP, ABP pulse amplitude (ampABP), ICP, CPP, pbtO2, heart rate (HR), ICP pulse amplitude (ampICP), PRx, and ORx, before, during, and after each plateau wave. The analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc test was used to compare the differences in the variables before, during, and after the plateau wave. We considered all plateau waves, even in the same patient, independent because they are separated by long intervals.
We found increases for ICP and ampICP according to our operational definitions for plateau waves. PRx increased significantly (p = 0.00026), CPP (p < 0.00001) and pbtO2 (p = 0.00007) decreased significantly during the plateau waves. ABP, ampABP, and HR remained unchanged. PRx during the plateau was higher than before the onset of wave in 40 cases (73 %) with no differences in baseline parameters for those with negative and positive ΔPRx (difference during and after). ORx showed an increase during and a decrease after the plateau waves, however, not statistically significant. PbtO2 overshoot after the wave occurred in 35 times (64 %), the mean difference was 4.9 ± 4.6 Hg (mean ± SD), and we found no difference in baseline parameters between those who overshoot and those who did not overshoot.
Arterial blood pressure remains stable in ICP plateau waves, while cerebral autoregulatory indices show distinct changes, which indicate cerebrovascular reactivity impairment at the top of the wave. PbtO2 decreases during the waves and may show a slight overshoot after normalization. We assume that this might be due to different latencies of the cerebral blood flow and oxygen level control mechanisms. Other factors may include baseline conditions, such as pre-plateau wave cerebrovascular reactivity or pbtO2 levels, which differ between studies.
颅内压(ICP)平台波在神经重症监护中经常被记录到,但尚未被完全理解。为了进一步研究这一现象,我们在一项观察性研究中分析了脑氧分压(pbtO2)、ICP与平均动脉血压(ABP)之间的移动相关系数(称为PRx),以及脑氧反应性指数(ORx),即脑灌注压(CPP)与pbtO2之间的移动相关系数。
我们分析了20例重型颅脑损伤患者的55次平台波。我们计算了每次平台波之前、期间和之后的ABP、ABP脉搏振幅(ampABP)、ICP、CPP、pbtO2、心率(HR)、ICP脉搏振幅(ampICP)、PRx和ORx。采用方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验来比较平台波之前、期间和之后各变量的差异。我们将所有平台波视为独立的,即使是同一患者的平台波,因为它们之间间隔较长。
根据我们对平台波的操作定义,我们发现ICP和ampICP升高。在平台波期间,PRx显著升高(p = 0.00026),CPP(p < 0.00001)和pbtO2(p = 0.00007)显著降低。ABP、ampABP和HR保持不变。在40例(73%)患者中,平台波期间的PRx高于波发作前,ΔPRx(期间与之后的差值)为负和正的患者的基线参数无差异。ORx在平台波期间升高,之后降低,但无统计学意义。波后pbtO2超调发生35次(64%),平均差值为4.9±4.6 mmHg(平均值±标准差),我们发现超调患者和未超调患者的基线参数无差异。
在ICP平台波期间动脉血压保持稳定,而脑自动调节指数显示出明显变化,这表明在波峰处脑血管反应性受损。在波期间pbtO2降低,在恢复正常后可能会有轻微超调。我们认为这可能是由于脑血流和氧水平控制机制的不同延迟所致。其他因素可能包括基线条件,如平台波前的脑血管反应性或pbtO2水平,不同研究之间存在差异。