Bussmann Rainer W, Sharon Douglas
William L, Brown Center, Missouri Botanical Garden, PO Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166-0299, USA.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009 Feb 2;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-5-4.
This paper examines the traditional use of medicinal plants in Northern Peru and Southern Ecuador, with special focus on the Departments of Piura, Lambayeque, La Libertad, Cajamarca, and San Martin, and in Loja province, with special focus on the development since the early colonial period. Northern Peru represents the locus of the old Central Andean "Health Axis." The roots of traditional healing practices in this region go as far back as the Cupisnique culture early in the first millennium BC. Northern Peru and Southern Ecuador share the same cultural context and flora but show striking differences in plant use and traditional knowledge. Two hundred fifteen plant species used for medicinal purposes in Ecuador and 510 plant species used for medicinal purposes in Peru were collected, identified,. and their vernacular names, traditional uses, and applications recorded. This number of species indicates that the healers, market vendors, and members of the public interviewed in Peru still have a very high knowledge of plants in their surroundings, which can be seen as a reflection of the knowledge of the population in general. In Ecuador much of the original plant knowledge has already been lost. In Peru, 433 (85%) were Dicotyledons, 46 (9%) Monocotyledons, 21 (4%) Pteridophytes, and 5 (1%) Gymnosperms. Three species of Giartina (Algae) and one species of the Lichen genus Siphula were used. The families best represented were Asteraceae with 69 species, Fabaceae (35), Lamiaceae (25), and Solanaceae (21). Euphorbiaceae had 12 species, and Poaceae and Apiaceae each accounted for 11 species. In Ecuador the families best represented were Asteraceae (32 species), Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Solanaceae (11 species each), and Apiaceae, Fabaceae, Lycopodiaceae (9 species each). One hundred eighty-two (85%) of the species used were Dicotyledons, 20 Monocotyledons (9.3%), 12 ferns (5.5%), and one unidentified lichen was used. Most of the plants used (83%) were native to Peru and Ecuador. Fresh plants, often collected wild, were used in two thirds of all cases in Peru, but in almost 95% of the cases in Ecuador. The most common applications included the ingestion of herb decoctions or the application of plant material as poultices. Although about 50% of the plants in use in the colonial period have disappeared from the popular pharmacopoeia, the overall number of plant species used medicinally has increased in Northern Peru, while Southern Ecuador shows a decline of plant knowledge since colonial times.
本文考察了秘鲁北部和厄瓜多尔南部药用植物的传统用途,特别关注皮斯科、兰巴耶克、拉利伯塔德、卡哈马卡和圣马丁省,以及洛哈省,重点研究了自殖民早期以来的发展情况。秘鲁北部是古老的安第斯中部“健康轴心”所在地。该地区传统治疗方法的根源可追溯到公元前一千年早期的库皮斯尼克文化。秘鲁北部和厄瓜多尔南部有着相同的文化背景和植物群,但在植物用途和传统知识方面存在显著差异。收集、鉴定了厄瓜多尔215种药用植物和秘鲁510种药用植物,并记录了它们的俗名、传统用途和应用。这一物种数量表明,在秘鲁接受采访的治疗师、市场摊贩和公众对周围植物的了解仍然非常高,这可以被视为一般民众知识的反映。在厄瓜多尔,许多原始的植物知识已经失传。在秘鲁,433种(85%)是双子叶植物,46种(9%)是单子叶植物,21种(4%)是蕨类植物,5种(1%)是裸子植物。使用了3种贾蒂纳属(藻类)和1种管苔属地衣。代表性最强的科是菊科,有69种,豆科(35种)、唇形科(25种)和茄科(21种)。大戟科有12种,禾本科和伞形科各有11种。在厄瓜多尔,代表性最强的科是菊科(32种)、大戟科、唇形科和茄科(各11种),以及伞形科、豆科、石松科(各9种)。所使用的物种中有182种(85%)是双子叶植物,20种单子叶植物(9.3%),12种蕨类植物(5.5%),还使用了1种未鉴定的地衣。所使用的大多数植物(83%)原产于秘鲁和厄瓜多尔。新鲜植物通常是野生采集的,在秘鲁,三分之二的情况下使用新鲜植物,但在厄瓜多尔,几乎95%的情况下使用新鲜植物。最常见的应用包括饮用草药汤剂或将植物材料用作膏药。尽管殖民时期使用的植物中约有50%已从常用药典中消失,但秘鲁北部药用植物的总体数量有所增加,而自殖民时代以来,厄瓜多尔南部的植物知识有所下降。