• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
National survey of patients' bill of rights statutes.患者权利法规全国调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):489-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
2
United Ostomy Associations of America's Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights: An Examination of Best-in-Practice Care for Ostomy Patients.美国造口协会的造口和肠转流患者权利法案:对造口患者最佳实践护理的考察。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(5):462-468. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000909.
3
Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights: Research Validation of Standards of Care.造口和肠造口术患者权利法案:护理标准的研究验证。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(3):251-260. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000876.
4
Notices of Privacy Practices: a survey of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 documents presented to patients at US hospitals.隐私惯例通知:对美国医院向患者提供的1996年《健康保险流通与责任法案》文件的一项调查。
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):558-64. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163646.90393.e4.
5
Awareness and Knowledge of Patients' Bill of Right among Physicians and Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Southwest Nigeria.在尼日利亚西南部的一家三级医院中,医生和患者对患者权利法案的认知和了解。
West Afr J Med. 2020 Nov;37(6):606-611.
6
Advancing the Rights of Patients in Nigeria: Analysing the Patients' Bill of Rights.推进尼日利亚患者权利:分析《患者权利法案》。
J Law Med. 2023 May;30(1):235-249.
7
Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level?可读性评估:泌尿妇科患者教育材料的阅读水平是否合适?
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):139-144. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000653.
8
Do informed consent documents for chiropractic clinical research studies meet readability level recommendations and contain required elements: a descriptive study.脊椎按摩疗法临床研究的知情同意文件是否符合可读性水平建议并包含所需要素:一项描述性研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Dec 10;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0040-9. eCollection 2014.
9
Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.侵入性操作同意书的可读性。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):830-3. doi: 10.1111/cts.12364. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.

引用本文的文献

1
Large Language Models for Pre-mediation Counseling in Medical Disputes: A Comparative Evaluation against Human Experts.用于医疗纠纷调解前咨询的大语言模型:与人类专家的比较评估
Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Apr;31(2):200-208. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.200. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic.英文与阿拉伯文患者教育材料的可读性
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Jul 19;3(3):e170-e173. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190528-01. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
The FDA-Approved Essure Device Counseling Order Fails to Promote Patient Empowerment.美国食品药品监督管理局批准的爱适易设备咨询令未能促进患者赋权。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Apr;3(2):e70-e73. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190306-01. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
4
Patient's Bill of Rights: Is it a Challenge for Quality Health Care in Saudi Arabia?患者权利法案:它对沙特阿拉伯的优质医疗保健构成挑战吗?
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2017 Sep-Dec;5(3):254-259. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_147_16. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
5
Assessing knowledge of the patient bill of rights in central Saudi Arabia: a survey of primary health care providers and recipients.评估沙特阿拉伯中部地区患者权利法案的知晓情况:对初级卫生保健提供者和接受者的一项调查。
Ann Saudi Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):151-5. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2012.151.

本文引用的文献

1
Bioethics discovers the Bill of Rights.生物伦理学发现了《权利法案》。
Natl Forum. 1989 Fall;69(4):11-3.
2
Notices of Privacy Practices: a survey of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 documents presented to patients at US hospitals.隐私惯例通知:对美国医院向患者提供的1996年《健康保险流通与责任法案》文件的一项调查。
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):558-64. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163646.90393.e4.
3
Patients' bill of rights: legislative cure-all or prescription for disaster?患者权利法案:立法万灵药还是灾难处方?
North Carol Law Rev. 2003;81:653-96.
4
Promotion and enforcement of patients' rights.促进和保障患者权利。
Med Law. 2004;23(2):289-97.
5
Patients rights and accountability: can there exist rights without remedies in an American legal and legislative framework?患者权利与责任:在美国的法律和立法框架下,能否存在没有救济措施的权利?
Med Law. 2003;22(3):429-50.
6
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.知情同意书的可读性标准与实际可读性对比
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212.
7
Managed care and patients' rights.管理式医疗与患者权利。
JAMA. 2003 Feb 19;289(7):906-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.7.906.
8
Physician-industry relations. Part 1: individual physicians.医生与行业的关系。第一部分:个体医生。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):396-402. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00014.
9
Whatever happened to the patient's bill of rights?患者权利法案怎么了?
Med Econ. 1975 Aug 4;52(16):109-110+.
10
A.H.A. Bill of Rights.美国心脏协会权利法案。
Trial. 1973 Nov-Dec;9(6):59-61.

患者权利法规全国调查。

National survey of patients' bill of rights statutes.

作者信息

Paasche-Orlow Michael K, Jacob Dan M, Hochhauser Mark, Parker Ruth M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Boston, University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):489-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z
PMID:19189192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2659155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite vigorous national debate between 1999-2001 the federal patients' bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be undermined by overly complex language, we surveyed the readability of hospital PBOR documents as well as texts mandated by state law.

METHODS

State Web sites and codes were searched to identify PBOR statutes for general patient populations. The rights addressed were compared with the 12 themes presented in the American Hospital Association's (AHA) PBOR text of 2002. In addition, we obtained PBOR texts from a sample of hospitals in each state. Readability was evaluated using Prose, a software program which reports an average of eight readability formulas.

RESULTS

Of 23 states with a PBOR statute for the general public, all establish a grievance policy, four protect a private right of action, and one stipulates fines for violations. These laws address an average of 7.4 of the 12 AHA themes. Nine states' statutes specify PBOR text for distribution to patients. These documents have an average readability of 15th grade (range, 11.6, New York, to 17.0, Minnesota). PBOR documents from 240 US hospitals have an average readability of 14th grade (range, 8.2 to 17.0).

CONCLUSIONS

While the average U.S. adult reads at an 8th grade reading level, an advanced college reading level is routinely required to read PBOR documents. Patients are not likely to learn about their rights from documents they cannot read.

摘要

背景

尽管在1999年至2001年间进行了激烈的全国性辩论,但联邦患者权利法案(PBOR)并未颁布。然而,各州已颁布立法,联合委员会也制定了一项认证标准,以便向患者告知他们的权利。由于此类举措可能会因语言过于复杂而受到影响,我们调查了医院患者权利法案文件以及州法律规定文本的可读性。

方法

搜索州网站和法规,以确定针对普通患者群体的患者权利法案法规。将所涉及的权利与美国医院协会(AHA)2002年患者权利法案文本中提出的12个主题进行比较。此外,我们从每个州的一组医院样本中获取了患者权利法案文本。使用Prose软件程序评估可读性,该程序报告八个可读性公式的平均值。

结果

在23个为公众制定了患者权利法案法规的州中,所有州都制定了申诉政策,4个州保护私人诉讼权,1个州规定了违规罚款。这些法律平均涉及AHA的12个主题中的7.4个。9个州的法规指定了要分发给患者的患者权利法案文本。这些文件的平均可读性为15年级(范围为纽约的11.6至明尼苏达的17.0)。来自240家美国医院的患者权利法案文件的平均可读性为14年级(范围为8.2至17.0)。

结论

虽然美国成年人的平均阅读水平为8年级,但通常需要大学高年级的阅读水平才能阅读患者权利法案文件。患者不太可能从他们读不懂的文件中了解自己的权利。