Suppr超能文献

患者权利法规全国调查。

National survey of patients' bill of rights statutes.

作者信息

Paasche-Orlow Michael K, Jacob Dan M, Hochhauser Mark, Parker Ruth M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Boston, University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):489-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite vigorous national debate between 1999-2001 the federal patients' bill of rights (PBOR) was not enacted. However, states have enacted legislation and the Joint Commission defined an accreditation standard to present patients with their rights. Because such initiatives can be undermined by overly complex language, we surveyed the readability of hospital PBOR documents as well as texts mandated by state law.

METHODS

State Web sites and codes were searched to identify PBOR statutes for general patient populations. The rights addressed were compared with the 12 themes presented in the American Hospital Association's (AHA) PBOR text of 2002. In addition, we obtained PBOR texts from a sample of hospitals in each state. Readability was evaluated using Prose, a software program which reports an average of eight readability formulas.

RESULTS

Of 23 states with a PBOR statute for the general public, all establish a grievance policy, four protect a private right of action, and one stipulates fines for violations. These laws address an average of 7.4 of the 12 AHA themes. Nine states' statutes specify PBOR text for distribution to patients. These documents have an average readability of 15th grade (range, 11.6, New York, to 17.0, Minnesota). PBOR documents from 240 US hospitals have an average readability of 14th grade (range, 8.2 to 17.0).

CONCLUSIONS

While the average U.S. adult reads at an 8th grade reading level, an advanced college reading level is routinely required to read PBOR documents. Patients are not likely to learn about their rights from documents they cannot read.

摘要

背景

尽管在1999年至2001年间进行了激烈的全国性辩论,但联邦患者权利法案(PBOR)并未颁布。然而,各州已颁布立法,联合委员会也制定了一项认证标准,以便向患者告知他们的权利。由于此类举措可能会因语言过于复杂而受到影响,我们调查了医院患者权利法案文件以及州法律规定文本的可读性。

方法

搜索州网站和法规,以确定针对普通患者群体的患者权利法案法规。将所涉及的权利与美国医院协会(AHA)2002年患者权利法案文本中提出的12个主题进行比较。此外,我们从每个州的一组医院样本中获取了患者权利法案文本。使用Prose软件程序评估可读性,该程序报告八个可读性公式的平均值。

结果

在23个为公众制定了患者权利法案法规的州中,所有州都制定了申诉政策,4个州保护私人诉讼权,1个州规定了违规罚款。这些法律平均涉及AHA的12个主题中的7.4个。9个州的法规指定了要分发给患者的患者权利法案文本。这些文件的平均可读性为15年级(范围为纽约的11.6至明尼苏达的17.0)。来自240家美国医院的患者权利法案文件的平均可读性为14年级(范围为8.2至17.0)。

结论

虽然美国成年人的平均阅读水平为8年级,但通常需要大学高年级的阅读水平才能阅读患者权利法案文件。患者不太可能从他们读不懂的文件中了解自己的权利。

相似文献

1
National survey of patients' bill of rights statutes.
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Apr;24(4):489-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0914-z. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
3
Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights: Research Validation of Standards of Care.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(3):251-260. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000876.
7
Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level?
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):139-144. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000653.
9
Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):830-3. doi: 10.1111/cts.12364. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Large Language Models for Pre-mediation Counseling in Medical Disputes: A Comparative Evaluation against Human Experts.
Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Apr;31(2):200-208. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.200. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Jul 19;3(3):e170-e173. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190528-01. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
The FDA-Approved Essure Device Counseling Order Fails to Promote Patient Empowerment.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Apr;3(2):e70-e73. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190306-01. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
4
Patient's Bill of Rights: Is it a Challenge for Quality Health Care in Saudi Arabia?
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2017 Sep-Dec;5(3):254-259. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_147_16. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Bioethics discovers the Bill of Rights.
Natl Forum. 1989 Fall;69(4):11-3.
6
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212.
7
Managed care and patients' rights.
JAMA. 2003 Feb 19;289(7):906-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.7.906.
8
Physician-industry relations. Part 1: individual physicians.
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):396-402. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00014.
9
Whatever happened to the patient's bill of rights?
Med Econ. 1975 Aug 4;52(16):109-110+.
10
A.H.A. Bill of Rights.
Trial. 1973 Nov-Dec;9(6):59-61.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验