Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症急性症状患者中临床医生评定的个人和社会表现量表的信度、效度及检测变化的能力。

Reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the clinician-rated Personal and Social Performance scale in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia.

作者信息

Patrick Donald L, Burns Tom, Morosini Pierluigi, Rothman Margaret, Gagnon Dennis D, Wild Diane, Adriaenssen Ines

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-9455, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Feb;25(2):325-38. doi: 10.1185/03007990802611919.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the measurement properties of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), a clinician-reported measure of severity of personal and social dysfunction, in subjects with acute symptoms of schizophrenia.

METHODS

Pooled data from three paliperidone extended-release clinical studies (n = 1665) and data from a separate noninterventional, cross-sectional, validation study (n = 299) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The PSP showed good interrater (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.87) and test-retest (ICCs > 0.90) reliability. Pearson correlation coefficient for association between baseline PSP and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores was -0.32 for subjects assessed by the same rater and -0.29 for subjects assessed by different raters, suggesting low overlap in measurement constructs between the PANSS and PSP. Spearman Rank correlation coefficient for association between baseline PSP and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores was -0.51 with the same rater and -0.15 with different raters. Hypothesized relationships between the PSP and the PANSS or CGI-S based on levels of disease severity were prospectively defined. These hypotheses were confirmed by analyses showing statistically significant differences between baseline mean PSP scores in subjects grouped by severity rating on the CGI-S (mild or less vs. at least moderate) (p < 0.001) and the PANSS ('low symptom severity' vs. 'high symptom severity') (p = 0.005). The PSP was sensitive to change based on statistically significant correlations between change in the PSP and change in the CGI-S (p < 0.001) and the PANSS (p < 0.001). Limitations of analyses include pooling data across studies, interrater reliability assessment in the validation study only, post hoc assessment of test-retest reliability in the paliperidone ER studies, different raters for the PSP and PANSS not specified in the paliperidone ER studies, PSP validity assessment based on the PANSS and the CGI-S as comparators rather than another social function instrument.

CONCLUSION

These initial reliability and validity assessments suggest the PSP has promise as a measure of social functioning in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia.

摘要

目的

描述个人与社会功能量表(PSP)的测量特性,该量表由临床医生报告,用于衡量精神分裂症急性症状患者个人和社会功能障碍的严重程度。

方法

分析了三项帕利哌酮缓释临床研究(n = 1665)的汇总数据以及一项单独的非干预性横断面验证研究(n = 299)的数据。

结果

PSP显示出良好的评分者间信度(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.87)和重测信度(ICC>0.90)。由同一名评分者评估的受试者,基线PSP与阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分之间的Pearson相关系数为-0.32,由不同评分者评估的受试者为-0.29,这表明PANSS和PSP在测量结构上的重叠度较低。基线PSP与临床总体印象-严重程度(CGI-S)评分之间的Spearman等级相关系数,同一名评分者评估时为-0.51,不同评分者评估时为-0.15。基于疾病严重程度水平,前瞻性地定义了PSP与PANSS或CGI-S之间的假设关系。这些假设通过分析得到证实,分析显示,根据CGI-S(轻度或以下与至少中度)严重程度评分分组的受试者,基线平均PSP评分之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001),以及PANSS(“低症状严重程度”与“高症状严重程度”)之间存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.005)。基于PSP变化与CGI-S变化(p<0.001)和PANSS变化(p<0.001)之间的统计学显著相关性,PSP对变化敏感。分析的局限性包括跨研究汇总数据、仅在验证研究中进行评分者间信度评估、在帕利哌酮缓释研究中对重测信度进行事后评估、帕利哌酮缓释研究中未指定PSP和PANSS的不同评分者、基于PANSS和CGI-S作为比较指标而非另一种社会功能工具进行PSP效度评估。

结论

这些初步的信度和效度评估表明,PSP有望作为衡量精神分裂症急性症状患者社会功能的指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验