Fertility Unit, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):1911-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.064. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
To determine the accuracy and precision of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system by comparison with existing recommended manual methods.
Prospective study using comparative measurements of sperm concentration and motility on latex beads and immotile and motile sperm.
Tertiary referral fertility center with strong academic links.
PATIENT(S): Sperm donors and male partners of couples attending for fertility investigations.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Achievement of Accubead target value for high and low concentration suspensions. Repeatability as demonstrated by coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients. Correlation and limits of agreement between CASA and manual methods.
RESULT(S): The CASA measurements of latex beads and sperm concentrations demonstrated a high level of accuracy and repeatability. Repeated Accubead measurements attained the required target value (mean difference from target of 2.61% and 3.71% for high- and low-concentration suspensions, respectively) and were highly reproducible. Limits of agreement analysis suggested that manual and CASA counts compared directly could be deemed to be interchangeable. Manual and CASA motility measurements were highly correlated for grades a, b, and d but could not be deemed to be interchangeable, and manual motility estimates were consistently higher for motile sperm.
CONCLUSION(S): The novel CASA system was able to provide semen quality measurements for sperm concentration and motility measurements which were at least as reliable as current manual methods.
通过与现有的推荐手动方法比较,确定新型计算机辅助精子分析(CASA)系统的准确性和精密度。
使用乳胶珠和不动精子和活动精子的比较测量进行的前瞻性研究。
具有强大学术联系的三级转诊生育中心。
精子供体和接受生育调查的夫妇的男性伴侣。
无。
达到高浓度和低浓度悬浮液的 Accubead 目标值。通过变异系数和组内相关系数证明重复性。CASA 与手动方法之间的相关性和一致性界限。
乳胶珠和精子浓度的 CASA 测量显示出高度的准确性和可重复性。重复 Accubead 测量达到了所需的目标值(高浓度和低浓度悬浮液的目标值分别为 2.61%和 3.71%的平均差异),并且高度可重复。一致性界限分析表明,直接比较手动和 CASA 计数可以认为是可互换的。手动和 CASA 运动性测量在 a、b 和 d 级之间高度相关,但不能认为是可互换的,并且手动运动性估计对活动精子始终更高。
新型 CASA 系统能够提供精液质量测量,用于精子浓度和运动性测量,其可靠性至少与当前的手动方法相当。