Silsupadol Patima, Lugade Vipul, Shumway-Cook Anne, van Donkelaar Paul, Chou Li-Shan, Mayr Ulrich, Woollacott Marjorie H
Department of Human Physiology, 1240 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, United States.
Gait Posture. 2009 Jun;29(4):634-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of three different balance training strategies in an effort to understand the mechanisms underlying training-related changes in dual-task balance performance of older adults with balance impairment. Elderly individuals with balance impairment, age 65 and older, were randomly assigned to one of three individualized training programs: single-task (ST) balance training; dual-task training with fixed-priority (FP) instruction; and dual-task training with variable-priority (VP) instruction. Balance control during gait, under practiced and novel conditions, was assessed by calculating the center of mass and ankle joint center inclination angles in the frontal plane. A smaller angle indicated better balance performance. Other outcomes included gait velocity, stride length, verbal reaction time, and rate of response. All measures were collected at baseline and the end of the 4-week training. Results indicated that all training strategies were equally effective (P>.05) at improving balance performance (smaller inclination angle) under single-task contexts. However, the VP training strategy was more effective (P=.04) in improving both balance and cognitive performance under dual-task conditions than either the ST or the FP training strategies. Improved dual-task processing skills did not transfer to a novel dual-task condition. Results support Kramer et al.'s proposal that VP training improves both single-task automatization and the development of task-coordination skills.
本研究的目的是比较三种不同平衡训练策略的效果,以了解平衡受损的老年人在双任务平衡表现中与训练相关变化的潜在机制。65岁及以上有平衡障碍的老年人被随机分配到三个个性化训练项目之一:单任务(ST)平衡训练;固定优先级(FP)指令的双任务训练;以及可变优先级(VP)指令的双任务训练。通过计算额平面内的质心和踝关节中心倾斜角度,评估在熟练和新环境下步态期间的平衡控制。角度越小表明平衡表现越好。其他结果包括步态速度、步幅、言语反应时间和反应率。所有测量均在基线和4周训练结束时收集。结果表明,在单任务情境下,所有训练策略在改善平衡表现(较小倾斜角度)方面同样有效(P>0.05)。然而,在双任务条件下,VP训练策略在改善平衡和认知表现方面比ST或FP训练策略更有效(P = 0.04)。双任务处理技能的改善并未转移到新的双任务情境中。结果支持了克莱默等人的提议,即VP训练可改善单任务自动化和任务协调技能的发展。