Kheirabadi Bijan S, Edens Jason W, Terrazas Irasema B, Estep J Scot, Klemcke Harold G, Dubick Michael A, Holcomb John B
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234-6315, USA.
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):316-26; discussion 327-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819634a1.
HemCon bandage (HC) and QuikClot granules (QC) have been deployed for the past 5 years for treating external hemorrhage in combat casualties. We examined efficacy and initial safety of three new hemostatic granules/powders in a swine extremity arterial hemorrhage model that was 100% fatal with army standard gauze treatment. The new products were compared with the most advanced forms of HC and QC products.
Anesthetized pigs (37 kg, n = 46) were instrumented, splenectomized, and their femoral arteries were isolated and injured (6 mm arteriotomy). After 45 seconds free bleeding, a test agent [WoundStat (WS), super quick relief (SQR), Celox (CX)] or a control product [HC or QC bead bags (advanced clotting sponge plus)] was applied to the wounds and compressed with a large gauze for 2 minutes. Fluid resuscitation (colloid and crystalloid) was given and titrated to a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg. Animals were observed for 180 minutes or until death. Computed tomography angiography was performed on survivors and tissue samples were collected form wounds for histologic examination.
No differences were found in baseline measurements and pretreatment blood loss (17.4 mL/kg +/- 0.5 mL/kg, mean +/- SEM) among groups. Advanced clotting sponge plus testing was halted after six unsuccessful attempts (no hemostasis observed) whereas other agents were tested each in 10 animals. Stable hemostasis was achieved in 10 (WS), 7 (SQR), 6 (CX), and 1 (HC) subjects in each group, resulting in the recovery of mean arterial pressure and survival of the animals for 3 hours (p < 0.05, SQR or WS vs. HC). Posttreatment blood loss was significantly reduced with the use of the new agents (CX = 40 +/- 16.6, SQR = 34.5 +/- 16.3, WS = 9.5 mL/kg +/- 5.2 mL/kg) as compared with HC (85.6 mL/kg +/- 10 mL/kg, p < 0.05). The granular treated animals lived for 180 (WS), 164 +/- 8.2 (SQR) and 138 +/- 17.7 (CX) minutes, significantly (p < 0.05) longer than the HC (83.3 +/- 12 minutes) group. A significant (p < 0.05) rise in temperature (53.5 degrees C +/- 1.8 degrees C) over baseline (36.5 degrees C +/- 0.3 degrees C) was measured only in the wounds treated with SQR. Computed tomography images showed no blood flow through treated vessels. Histologic evidence indicated the least tissue damage with HC, moderate damage with WS and CX, and most damage including axonal necrosis with SQR.
The new hemostatic agents are significantly more effective in treating arterial hemorrhage than currently deployed products. Among them, WS granules appear to be most efficacious, followed by SQR and CX powders. The clinical significance of tissue damage caused by these agents and any potential risk of embolism with procoagulant granular/powder products are unknown and warrant survival studies.
在过去5年中,HemCon绷带(HC)和快速凝血颗粒(QC)已被用于治疗战斗伤员的外出血。我们在猪的肢体动脉出血模型中研究了三种新型止血颗粒/粉末的疗效和初始安全性,该模型采用军队标准纱布治疗时死亡率为100%。将这些新产品与HC和QC产品的最先进形式进行了比较。
对麻醉的猪(37千克,n = 46)进行仪器植入、脾切除,并分离和损伤其股动脉(6毫米动脉切开术)。在自由出血45秒后,将一种测试剂[创伤止血剂(WS)、超快止血剂(SQR)、赛洛克斯(CX)]或一种对照产品[HC或QC珠袋(高级凝血海绵加)]应用于伤口,并用一块大纱布压迫2分钟。给予液体复苏(胶体和晶体)并滴定至平均动脉压为65毫米汞柱。观察动物180分钟或直至死亡。对存活的动物进行计算机断层扫描血管造影,并从伤口收集组织样本进行组织学检查。
各组间基线测量和治疗前失血量(17.4毫升/千克±0.5毫升/千克,平均值±标准误)无差异。在6次尝试失败(未观察到止血)后,停止了高级凝血海绵加的测试,而其他试剂每组在10只动物中进行测试。每组中,10只(WS)、7只(SQR)、6只(CX)和1只(HC)动物实现了稳定止血,导致平均动脉压恢复,动物存活3小时(p < 0.05,SQR或WS与HC相比)。与HC(85.6毫升/千克±10毫升/千克,p < 0.05)相比,使用新型试剂后治疗后失血量显著减少(CX = 40±16.6,SQR = 34.5±16.3,WS = 9.5毫升/千克±5.2毫升/千克)。颗粒治疗的动物存活了180分钟(WS)、164±8.2分钟(SQR)和138±17.7分钟(CX),显著(p < 0.05)长于HC组(83.3±12分钟)。仅在使用SQR治疗的伤口中,测量到温度较基线(36.5℃±0.3℃)显著(p < 0.05)升高(53.5℃±1.8℃)。计算机断层扫描图像显示治疗后的血管无血流。组织学证据表明,HC造成的组织损伤最小,WS和CX造成中度损伤,SQR造成的损伤最大,包括轴突坏死。
新型止血剂在治疗动脉出血方面比目前使用的产品显著更有效。其中,WS颗粒似乎最有效,其次是SQR和CX粉末。这些试剂引起的组织损伤的临床意义以及促凝血颗粒/粉末产品的任何潜在栓塞风险尚不清楚,需要进行生存研究。