Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
J Oral Rehabil. 2009 May;36(5):313-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01932.x. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of stress and anxiety on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of masticatory muscles and on the subjective pain report. Forty-five women, students, with mean age of 19.75 years, were divided into two groups: group 1:29 presenting with masticatory myofascial pain (MFP), according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders and group 2: 16 asymptomatic controls. An electronic algometer registered the pain thresholds on four different occasions throughout the academic year. To measure levels of stress, anxiety and pain, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Lipp Stress Symptoms Inventory and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used. Three-way anova and Tukey's tests were used to verify differences in PPT between groups, times and sites. Levels of anxiety and VAS were compared using Mann-Whitney test, while Friedman's test was used for the within-groups comparison at different times (T1 to T4). The chi-squared and Cochran tests were performed to compare groups for the proportion of subjects with stress (alpha = 0.05). Differences in PPT recordings between time (P = 0.001) and sites (P < 0.001) were detected. Higher levels of anxiety and lower PPT figures were detected at T2 (academic examination) (P = 0.001). There was no difference between groups for anxiety and stress at any time (P > 0.05). The MFP group also has shown significant increase of VAS at the time of academic examination (P < 0.001). External stressors such as academic examinations have a potential impact on masticatory muscle tenderness, regardless of the presence of a previous condition such as masticatory myofascial pain.
本研究旨在评估压力和焦虑对咀嚼肌压痛阈值(PPT)和主观疼痛报告的影响。45 名年龄在 19.75 岁的女性学生被分为两组:组 1:29 名患有咀嚼肌筋膜疼痛(MFP),根据颞下颌关节紊乱研究诊断标准;组 2:16 名无症状对照。电子压痛计在整个学年的四个不同时间记录疼痛阈值。为了测量压力、焦虑和疼痛的水平,使用贝克焦虑量表、利普压力症状量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。使用三因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验来验证组间、时间和部位的 PPT 差异。使用 Mann-Whitney 检验比较焦虑和 VAS 水平,使用 Friedman 检验在不同时间(T1 到 T4)进行组内比较。使用卡方和 Cochran 检验比较两组的压力(alpha = 0.05)比例。检测到时间(P = 0.001)和部位(P < 0.001)之间 PPT 记录的差异。在学术考试(T2)时,焦虑水平较高和 PPT 数值较低(P = 0.001)。在任何时间,两组的焦虑和压力都没有差异(P > 0.05)。MFP 组在学术考试时 VAS 也显著增加(P < 0.001)。学术考试等外部压力源可能会对咀嚼肌压痛产生影响,无论是否存在咀嚼肌筋膜疼痛等先前的情况。