Bastiaanse Roelien, Bouma Gosse, Post Wendy
Center for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG), University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Brain Lang. 2009 Apr;109(1):18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
There is a long standing debate between aphasiologists on the essential factor that constitutes the behavioral patterns of loss and preservation in agrammatic Broca's aphasia. It has been suggested that linguistic complexity plays a crucial role: linguistically complex structures are more difficult to produce than linguistically simple ones. However, linguistic complex structures are often less frequent in a language; for example, simple active sentences are more frequently used than linguistically more complex passive sentences. Hence, it might be that it is not linguistic complexity but frequency that determines agrammatic behavior. Frequency may play a role at several levels. For agrammatic patients, for example, the frequency of sentence constructions may be crucial, whereas for fluent aphasic speakers word frequency influences performance. The present study presents corpus frequency data for constructions that have previously been used to show the influence of linguistic complexity on Dutch agrammatic speech production. These are data on: (1) verb movement; (2) object scrambling; and (3) verbs with alternating transitivity. We compared the data of our corpus research with the performance of agrammatic speakers on the constructions. The conclusion is that frequency cannot account for the data, but linguistic complexity can. It is then discussed what 'linguistic complexity' exactly stands for, in terms of the word order deficit in agrammatic aphasia.
失语症专家们长期以来一直在争论,构成语法缺失型布罗卡失语症中语言丧失和保留行为模式的关键因素是什么。有人提出,语言复杂性起着至关重要的作用:语言复杂的结构比语言简单的结构更难生成。然而,语言复杂的结构在一种语言中往往出现频率较低;例如,简单的主动句比语言结构更复杂的被动句使用得更频繁。因此,可能不是语言复杂性而是频率决定了语法缺失行为。频率可能在几个层面上发挥作用。例如,对于语法缺失患者来说,句子结构的频率可能至关重要,而对于流利型失语症患者来说,单词频率会影响表现。本研究给出了一些结构的语料库频率数据,这些结构以前被用来证明语言复杂性对荷兰语语法缺失言语产生的影响。这些数据涉及:(1)动词移位;(2)宾语移位;以及(3)具有交替及物性的动词。我们将语料库研究的数据与语法缺失患者在这些结构上的表现进行了比较。结论是,频率无法解释这些数据,但语言复杂性可以。然后,就语法缺失型失语症中的词序缺陷而言,讨论了“语言复杂性”到底代表什么。