Suppr超能文献

肥胖患者生活方式改善计划实施方法的比较:一项随机试验。

Comparison of methods for delivering a lifestyle modification program for obese patients: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Digenio Andres G, Mancuso James P, Gerber Robert A, Dvorak Roman V

机构信息

Pfizer, South Lyme, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 17;150(4):255-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-4-200902170-00006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians frequently prescribe medications for weight loss but offer minimal lifestyle counseling despite the additional benefits of combining both interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 5 methods of delivering a lifestyle modification program to obese patients receiving sibutramine.

DESIGN

Randomized, 6-month, open-label study. Participants were assigned to intervention groups by using a computer-generated schedule of randomly permuted blocks. Block length was 5.

SETTING

12 independent research clinics with experience running obesity trials.

PATIENTS

376 patients with obesity (body mass index > or =30 and <40 kg/m(2)).

INTERVENTION

High-frequency face-to-face lifestyle modification counseling (HF-F2F) (n = 74), low-frequency face-to-face counseling (LF-F2F) (n = 76), high-frequency telephone counseling (HF-TEL) (n = 76), high-frequency e-mail counseling (HF-EMAIL) (n = 74), or no dietitian contact (self-help [SELF]) (n = 76). All participants received sibutramine, 10 mg/d; a lifestyle manual; and access to a weight-loss Web site.

MEASUREMENTS

Percentage change in body weight at 6 months was the primary outcome. Secondary end points included changes in waist circumference; lipid, glucose, and insulin levels; blood pressure; weight-related symptoms; and quality of life at 6 months.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the mean weight loss, relative to baseline, in the HF-F2F and HF-TEL groups was similar (8.9% [95% CI, 8.0% to 9.8%] and 7.7% [CI, 6.8% to 8.7%]) and significantly greater than that in the other groups (LF-F2F, 6.4% [CI, 5.4% to 7.3%]; HF-EMAIL, 5.9% [CI, 5.0% to 6.8%]; and SELF, 5.2% [CI, 4.3% to 6.1%]). All groups showed significant improvements in waist circumference, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and measures of quality of life and weight-related symptoms. There were no serious adverse events and no differences in minor events among groups.

LIMITATION

Most participants were women, and the attrition rate was 30%.

CONCLUSION

High-frequency telephone contact with a dietitian was similar to HF-F2F contact for supporting lifestyle modification in obese patients trying to lose weight. The findings might be used by providers and health systems to promote healthy lifestyle changes for their patients.

FUNDING

Pfizer Global Research and Development.

摘要

背景

医生经常开减肥药,但尽管将两种干预措施结合起来会带来更多益处,却很少提供生活方式咨询。

目的

比较向服用西布曲明的肥胖患者提供生活方式改变计划的5种方法。

设计

随机、为期6个月的开放标签研究。使用计算机生成的随机排列区组时间表将参与者分配到干预组。区组长度为5。

地点

12家有肥胖试验经验的独立研究诊所。

患者

376例肥胖患者(体重指数≥30且<40kg/m²)。

干预措施

高频面对面生活方式改变咨询(HF-F2F)(n = 74)、低频面对面咨询(LF-F2F)(n = 76)、高频电话咨询(HF-TEL)(n = 76)、高频电子邮件咨询(HF-EMAIL)(n = 74)或无营养师接触(自助[SELF])(n = 76)。所有参与者均接受西布曲明,10mg/天;一本生活方式手册;以及访问一个减肥网站。

测量指标

6个月时体重的百分比变化是主要结局。次要终点包括腰围、血脂、血糖和胰岛素水平、血压、与体重相关的症状以及6个月时的生活质量变化。

结果

6个月时,HF-F2F组和HF-TEL组相对于基线的平均体重减轻相似(分别为8.9%[95%CI,8.0%至9.8%]和7.7%[CI,6.8%至8.7%]),且显著大于其他组(LF-F2F组为6.4%[CI,5.4%至7.3%];HF-EMAIL组为5.9%[CI,5.0%至6.8%];SELF组为5.2%[CI,4.3%至6.1%])。所有组在腰围、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和甘油三酯水平以及生活质量和与体重相关症状的测量指标方面均有显著改善。未发生严重不良事件,组间轻微事件也无差异。

局限性

大多数参与者为女性,损耗率为30%。

结论

对于试图减肥的肥胖患者,与营养师进行高频电话接触在支持生活方式改变方面与高频面对面接触相似。这些发现可供医疗服务提供者和卫生系统用于促进其患者的健康生活方式改变。

资助

辉瑞全球研发部。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验