Mahajan Anish P, Stemple Lara, Shapiro Martin F, King Jan B, Cunningham William E
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 17;150(4):263-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-4-200902170-00007.
In September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released the "Revised Recommendations for HIV Testing of Adults, Adolescents, and Pregnant Women in Health-care Settings" to improve screening and diagnosis. The CDC now recommends that all patients in all health care settings be offered opt-out HIV screening without separate written consent and prevention counseling. State law on HIV testing is widely assumed to be a barrier to implementing the recommendations. To help policymakers and providers better understand their own legal context and to correct possible misunderstandings about statutory compatibility, a state-by-state review (including Washington, DC) of all statutes pertaining to HIV testing was performed and the consistency of these laws with the new recommendations was systematically assessed. Criteria were developed for classifying state statutory frameworks as consistent, neutral, or inconsistent with the new recommendations, and the implications for implementation of the CDC recommendations in these various legal contexts were examined. The statutory frameworks of 34 states and Washington, DC, were found to be either consistent with or neutral to the new CDC recommendations, which would enable full implementation. Statutory frameworks of 16 states were inconsistent with the new CDC recommendations, which would preclude implementation of 1 or more of the novel provisions without legislative change. In the 2 years since release of the recommendations, 9 states have passed new legislation to move from being inconsistent to consistent with the guidelines. State statutory laws are evolving toward greater compliance with the CDC recommendations. Policymakers, provider groups, consumer advocates, and other stakeholders should ensure that HIV screening practices comply with existing state law and work to amend inconsistent laws if they are interested in implementing the CDC recommendations.
2006年9月,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)发布了《医疗机构中成人、青少年及孕妇HIV检测的修订建议》,以改进筛查与诊断工作。CDC现建议,在所有医疗机构中,应为所有患者提供无需另行书面同意和预防咨询的主动式HIV筛查。人们普遍认为,各州关于HIV检测的法律是实施这些建议的障碍。为帮助政策制定者和医疗服务提供者更好地了解自身的法律环境,并纠正对法规兼容性可能存在的误解,我们对所有与HIV检测相关的法规进行了逐州审查(包括华盛顿特区),并系统评估了这些法律与新建议的一致性。我们制定了标准,将各州的法定框架分类为与新建议一致、中立或不一致,并研究了在这些不同法律环境下实施CDC建议的影响。结果发现,34个州和华盛顿特区的法定框架与CDC的新建议一致或中立,这将有助于全面实施。16个州的法定框架与CDC的新建议不一致,这意味着在不进行立法修改的情况下,将无法实施1项或多项新规定。自这些建议发布后的两年里,已有9个州通过了新的立法,从不一致转变为与指南一致。各州的成文法正朝着更符合CDC建议的方向发展。政策制定者、医疗服务提供者团体、消费者权益倡导者及其他利益相关方应确保HIV筛查实践符合现行州法律,并在有意实施CDC建议时努力修改不一致的法律。