School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, 52 Pritchatts Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Br J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;43(13):1006-12. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.057356. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
Using examples from the field of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation, this review provides sports and health practitioners with a comprehensive, user-friendly, guide to selecting outcome measures for use with active populations. A series of questions are presented for consideration when selecting a measure: is the measure appropriate for the intended use? (appropriateness); is the measure acceptable to patients? (acceptability); is it feasible to use the measure? (feasibility); does the measure provide meaningful results? (interpretability); does the measure provide reproducible values? (reliability); does the measure assess what it is supposed to assess? (validity); can the measure detect change? (responsiveness); do substantial proportions of patients achieve the worst or best scores? (floor and ceiling effects); is the measure structured and scored correctly? (dimensionality and internal consistency); has the measure been tested with the types of patients with whom it will be used? (sample characteristics). Evaluation of the measure using these questions will assist practitioners in making their judgements.
以前交叉韧带康复领域的实例为例,本综述为运动和健康从业者提供了一个全面、易用的指南,帮助他们选择适用于活跃人群的结果测量指标。在选择测量指标时,提出了一系列问题供考虑:该指标是否适用于预期用途?(适宜性);该指标是否被患者接受?(可接受性);使用该指标是否可行?(可行性);该指标是否能提供有意义的结果?(可解释性);该指标是否能提供可重复的数值?(可靠性);该指标是否能评估其应评估的内容?(有效性);该指标是否能检测到变化?(反应性);是否有相当比例的患者达到最差或最佳得分?(地板效应和天花板效应);该指标的结构和评分是否正确?(维度和内部一致性);该指标是否已经在将使用它的患者类型中进行了测试?(样本特征)。使用这些问题对测量指标进行评估将有助于从业者做出判断。