School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, PMB 3011, Nigeria.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 21;18(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01552-4.
To generate high-quality evidence, contextually relevant outcome measurement instruments are required. Quality of life evaluation among polio survivors typically involves the use of generic instruments, which are developed and validated among a different groups of people. There is no clear evidence whether these instruments are appropriate for the measurement of quality of life among polio survivors in northwest Nigeria. The purpose of this review is to identify and select a pre-existing instrument that is best suited for the measurement of quality of life among polio survivors in northwest Nigeria.
Using the findings of a previous scoping review of the literature and qualitative descriptive study, we screened 11 quality of life instruments that are used in polio literature. We identified and selected the most appropriate instrument, which reflected the perspectives of polio survivors in northwest Nigeria and at the same time exhibited good measurement properties.
The Quality of Life Index, World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief, and Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale are consistent with the perspectives of polio survivors in northwest Nigeria and have satisfactory measurement properties. Among these instruments, the Quality of Life Index satisfied most of the screening criteria we employed and is suitable for cross-cultural adaptation in northwest Nigeria.
Most instruments that are employed to evaluate the quality of life of polio survivors were not primarily designed as a measure of quality of life. To select the appropriate instrument, there is a need to consider and reflect the perspectives of the individuals, to improve the validity of the measurement.
为了生成高质量的证据,需要有与上下文相关的结果测量工具。对脊灰幸存者的生活质量评估通常涉及使用通用工具,这些工具是在不同人群中开发和验证的。目前尚无明确证据表明这些工具是否适合测量尼日利亚西北部脊灰幸存者的生活质量。本研究的目的是确定并选择一个预先存在的、最适合测量尼日利亚西北部脊灰幸存者生活质量的工具。
我们使用先前文献的范围综述和定性描述性研究的结果,筛选了 11 种用于脊灰文献的生活质量工具。我们确定并选择了最合适的工具,该工具反映了尼日利亚西北部脊灰幸存者的观点,同时具有良好的测量特性。
生活质量指数、世界卫生组织生活质量简短量表和综合生活质量量表与尼日利亚西北部脊灰幸存者的观点一致,并且具有令人满意的测量特性。在这些工具中,生活质量指数满足了我们使用的大多数筛选标准,适合在尼日利亚西北部进行跨文化适应性调整。
大多数用于评估脊灰幸存者生活质量的工具并非主要用于衡量生活质量。为了选择合适的工具,需要考虑和反映个人的观点,以提高测量的有效性。