Stoetzer Ulrich, Ahlberg Gunnel, Johansson Gun, Bergman Peter, Hallsten Lennart, Forsell Yvonne, Lundberg Ingvar
Department of Public Health Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Occup Health. 2009;51(2):144-51. doi: 10.1539/joh.l8134. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
Studies have shown that interpersonal relations at work are important for several health related outcomes. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether low social support, serious conflict, exclusion by superiors or by co-workers at work may be determinants of depression.
In a representative Swedish cohort study data were obtained in two waves three years apart. 4,040 women and men who did not change their jobs between the waves were chosen for the study. Exposure and confounders were obtained at Time 1 and outcome, depression according to Bech's MDI at Time 2. Previous depression was controlled for by adjusting for depression at Time 1. Data were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analyses.
Odds-ratios adjusted for possible confounders and depression at base-line showed significant effects for all four exposures on depression (adjusted OR, low social support 1.5 CI 95% 1.1-2.0, serious conflict 1.4 CI 95% 1.1-1.9, exclusion by superiors 1.6 CI 95% 1.2-2.1 and exclusion by co-workers 1.7 CI 95% 1.2-2.3).
The present results support the conclusion that problematic interpersonal relationships at work can be determinants of depression. These prospective findings may be of relevance for prevention and when rehabilitating depressed patients.
研究表明,工作中的人际关系对多种与健康相关的结果具有重要意义。本研究旨在调查工作中社会支持低、严重冲突、上级或同事的排斥是否可能是抑郁症的决定因素。
在一项具有代表性的瑞典队列研究中,相隔三年分两波获取数据。选取两波之间未更换工作的4040名女性和男性作为研究对象。在第1时间点获取暴露因素和混杂因素,在第2时间点根据贝克抑郁量表获取结局指标——抑郁症。通过对第1时间点的抑郁症进行调整来控制既往抑郁症。使用多重逻辑回归分析对数据进行分析。
对可能的混杂因素和基线时的抑郁症进行调整后的优势比显示,所有四种暴露因素对抑郁症均有显著影响(调整后的OR,低社会支持1.5,95%CI 1.1 - 2.0;严重冲突1.4,95%CI 1.1 - 1.9;上级排斥1.6,95%CI 1.2 - 2.1;同事排斥1.7,95%CI 1.2 - 2.3)。
目前的结果支持这样的结论,即工作中存在问题的人际关系可能是抑郁症的决定因素。这些前瞻性研究结果可能对抑郁症的预防以及抑郁症患者的康复具有重要意义。