• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机断层扫描放大骨窗在准确测量结石大小方面优于标准软组织窗:一项体外和临床研究。

Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study.

作者信息

Eisner Brian H, Kambadakone Avinash, Monga Manoj, Anderson James K, Thoreson Andrew A, Lee Hang, Dretler Stephen P, Sahani Dushyant V

机构信息

Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2009 Apr;181(4):1710-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.116. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.116
PMID:19230922
Abstract

PURPOSE

We determined the most accurate method of measuring urinary stones on computerized tomography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the in vitro portion of the study 24 calculi, including 12 calcium oxalate monohydrate and 12 uric acid stones, that had been previously collected at our clinic were measured manually with hand calipers as the gold standard measurement. The calculi were then embedded into human kidney-sized potatoes and scanned using 64-slice multidetector computerized tomography. Computerized tomography measurements were performed at 4 window settings, including standard soft tissue windows (window width-320 and window length-50), standard bone windows (window width-1120 and window length-300), 5.13x magnified soft tissue windows and 5.13x magnified bone windows. Maximum stone dimensions were recorded. For the in vivo portion of the study 41 patients with distal ureteral stones who underwent noncontrast computerized tomography and subsequently spontaneously passed the stones were analyzed. All analyzed stones were 100% calcium oxalate monohydrate or mixed, calcium based stones. Stones were prospectively collected at the clinic and the largest diameter was measured with digital calipers as the gold standard. This was compared to computerized tomography measurements using 4.0x magnified soft tissue windows and 4.0x magnified bone windows. Statistical comparisons were performed using Pearson's correlation and paired t test.

RESULTS

In the in vitro portion of the study the most accurate measurements were obtained using 5.13x magnified bone windows with a mean 0.13 mm difference from caliper measurement (p = 0.6). Measurements performed in the soft tissue window with and without magnification, and in the bone window without magnification were significantly different from hand caliper measurements (mean difference 1.2, 1.9 and 1.4 mm, p = 0.003, <0.001 and 0.0002, respectively). When comparing measurement errors between stones of different composition in vitro, the error for calcium oxalate calculi was significantly different from the gold standard for all methods except bone window settings with magnification. For uric acid calculi the measurement error was observed only in standard soft tissue window settings. In vivo 4.0x magnified bone windows was superior to 4.0x magnified soft tissue windows in measurement accuracy. Magnified bone window measurements were not statistically different from digital caliper measurements (mean underestimation vs digital caliper 0.3 mm, p = 0.4), while magnified soft tissue windows were statistically distinct (mean underestimation 1.4 mm, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study magnified bone windows were the most accurate method of stone measurements in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, we recommend the routine use of magnified bone windows for computerized tomography measurement of stones. In vitro the measurement error in calcium oxalate stones was greater than that in uric acid stones, suggesting that stone composition may be responsible for measurement inaccuracies.

摘要

目的

我们确定了在计算机断层扫描上测量尿路结石最准确的方法。

材料与方法

在本研究的体外部分,将之前在我们诊所收集的24块结石(包括12块一水草酸钙结石和12块尿酸结石)用手动卡尺进行测量,作为金标准测量。然后将这些结石嵌入人肾大小的土豆中,使用64层多探测器计算机断层扫描进行扫描。在4种窗宽设置下进行计算机断层扫描测量,包括标准软组织窗(窗宽320和窗长50)、标准骨窗(窗宽1120和窗长300)、5.13倍放大的软组织窗和5.13倍放大的骨窗。记录结石的最大尺寸。在本研究的体内部分,对41例输尿管下段结石患者进行了非增强计算机断层扫描,随后结石自行排出,对这些患者进行了分析。所有分析的结石均为100%一水草酸钙或混合钙基结石。结石在诊所前瞻性收集,并用数字卡尺测量最大直径作为金标准。将其与使用4.0倍放大的软组织窗和4.0倍放大的骨窗进行的计算机断层扫描测量结果进行比较。使用Pearson相关性分析和配对t检验进行统计学比较。

结果

在本研究的体外部分,使用5.13倍放大的骨窗获得的测量结果最准确,与卡尺测量的平均差值为0.13mm(p = 0.6)。在有或无放大的软组织窗以及无放大的骨窗中进行的测量与手动卡尺测量有显著差异(平均差值分别为1.2、1.9和1.4mm,p分别为0.003、<0.001和0.0002)。在体外比较不同成分结石的测量误差时,除了有放大的骨窗设置外,所有方法中草酸钙结石的误差与金标准有显著差异。对于尿酸结石,仅在标准软组织窗设置中观察到测量误差。在体内,4.0倍放大的骨窗在测量准确性方面优于4.0倍放大的软组织窗。放大的骨窗测量与数字卡尺测量无统计学差异(平均低估与数字卡尺相比为0.3mm,p = 0.4),而放大的软组织窗有统计学差异(平均低估1.4mm,p = 0.001)。

结论

在本研究中,放大的骨窗是体外和体内测量结石最准确的方法。因此,我们建议在计算机断层扫描测量结石时常规使用放大的骨窗。在体外,草酸钙结石的测量误差大于尿酸结石,提示结石成分可能是测量不准确的原因。

相似文献

1
Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study.计算机断层扫描放大骨窗在准确测量结石大小方面优于标准软组织窗:一项体外和临床研究。
J Urol. 2009 Apr;181(4):1710-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.116. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
2
Evaluating Region of Interest Measurement Strategies to Characterize Upper Urinary Tract Stones on Computerized Tomography.评估计算机断层扫描中用于表征上尿路结石的感兴趣区域测量策略
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):715-722. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.066. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
3
In-vitro comparison of different slice thicknesses and kernel settings for measurement of urinary stone size by computed tomography.体外比较不同切片厚度和内核设置对 CT 测量尿路结石大小的影响。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Dec;47(6):583-586. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01109-1. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
4
Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography.通过非增强螺旋计算机断层扫描测定尿结石的化学成分。
Urol Res. 2005 May;33(2):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s00240-004-0454-2. Epub 2005 Jan 6.
5
Accurately Diagnosing Uric Acid Stones from Conventional Computerized Tomography Imaging: Development and Preliminary Assessment of a Pixel Mapping Software.准确诊断尿酸结石:一种像素映射软件的开发和初步评估。
J Urol. 2018 Feb;199(2):487-494. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.069. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
6
Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements.计算机断层扫描窗宽影响肾结石的测量。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Sep-Oct;45(5):948-955. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0819.
7
Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation.尿路结石的螺旋CT:结石成分、结石大小及扫描准直的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):329-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750329.
8
[The usefulness of computerized axial tomography (CT) in establishing the composition of calculi].[计算机断层扫描(CT)在确定结石成分方面的作用]
Arch Esp Urol. 1993 Jun;46(5):383-91.
9
In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy CT.使用双能 CT 对尿石化学成分进行体内评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):W76-83. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5217.
10
Dual-energy vs conventional computed tomography in determining stone composition.双能与常规 CT 用于测定结石成分的比较。
Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.023. Epub 2014 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Ureteral Wall Thickness Measurement and Spontaneous Stone Passage A Narrative Review.输尿管壁厚度测量与结石自然排出:一篇叙述性综述
Curr Urol Rep. 2025 May 16;26(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s11934-025-01270-8.
2
Accurate prediction of pure uric acid urinary stones in clinical context via a combination of radiomics and machine learning.通过放射组学和机器学习的结合,在临床环境中准确预测纯尿酸尿结石。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):150. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04818-4.
3
Comparison of ureteral stone measurements for predicting the efficacy of a single session of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: one-, two-, and three-dimensional computed tomography measurements.
比较单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效预测:一维、二维和三维 CT 测量。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Mar 5;52(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01538-7.
4
Diagnostic performance and feasibility of dual-layer detector dual-energy CT for characterization of urinary stones in patients of different sizes.双层探测器双能 CT 对不同大小尿路结石患者进行特征描述的诊断性能和可行性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Jan;49(1):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04116-4. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
5
Influence of a Deep Learning Noise Reduction on the CT Values, Image Noise and Characterization of Kidney and Ureter Stones.深度学习降噪对肾和输尿管结石CT值、图像噪声及特征的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;12(7):1627. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071627.
6
Variables measured on three-dimensional computed tomography are preferred for predicting the outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.三维计算机断层扫描测量的变量更有助于预测冲击波碎石术的结果。
World J Urol. 2022 Feb;40(2):569-575. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03861-9. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
7
Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings.在计算机断层扫描中,使用多平面图像重建成像和骨窗设置进行手动肾结石大小测量最为准确。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 12;11(1):16437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95962-z.
8
Machine learning prediction of stone-free success in patients with urinary stone after treatment of shock wave lithotripsy.机器学习预测冲击波碎石术治疗后尿石症患者的结石清除成功率。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00662-x.
9
Computed tomography window affects kidney stones measurements.计算机断层扫描窗宽影响肾结石的测量。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Sep-Oct;45(5):948-955. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0819.
10
In-vitro comparison of different slice thicknesses and kernel settings for measurement of urinary stone size by computed tomography.体外比较不同切片厚度和内核设置对 CT 测量尿路结石大小的影响。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Dec;47(6):583-586. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01109-1. Epub 2019 Jan 16.