Department of Urology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 282 Monwha-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 35015.
Division of Medical Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 70 Yuseong-daero 1689beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 34047.
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00662-x.
The aims of this study were to determine the predictive value of decision support analysis for the shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) success rate and to analyze the data obtained from patients who underwent SWL to assess the factors influencing the outcome by using machine learning methods.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 358 patients who underwent SWL for urinary stone (kidney and upper-ureter stone) between 2015 and 2018 and evaluated the possible prognostic features, including patient population characteristics, urinary stone characteristics on a non-contrast, computed tomographic image. We performed 80% training set and 20% test set for the predictions of success and mainly used decision tree-based machine learning algorithms, such as random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting trees (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting method (LightGBM).
In machine learning analysis, the prediction accuracies for stone-free were 86.0, 87.5, and 87.9%, and those for one-session success were 78.0, 77.4, and 77.0% using RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM, respectively. In predictions for stone-free, LightGBM yielded the best accuracy and RF yielded the best one in those for one-session success among those methods. The sensitivity and specificity values for machine learning analytics are (0.74 to 0.78 and 0.92 to 0.93) for stone-free and (0.79 to 0.81 and 0.74 to 0.75) for one-session success, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) values for machine learning analytics are (0.84 to 0.85) for stone-free and (0.77 to 0.78) for one-session success and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are (0.730 to 0.933) and (0.673 to 0.866) in average of methods, respectively.
We applied a selected machine learning analysis to predict the result after treatment of SWL for urinary stone. About 88% accurate machine learning based predictive model was evaluated. The importance of machine learning algorithm can give matched insights to domain knowledge on effective and influential factors for SWL success outcomes.
本研究旨在确定决策支持分析对体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)成功率的预测价值,并通过机器学习方法分析接受 SWL 治疗的患者的数据,以评估影响结果的因素。
我们回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2018 年间 358 例接受 SWL 治疗的尿路结石(肾结石和输尿管上段结石)患者的病历,评估了可能的预后特征,包括患者人群特征、非对比 CT 图像上的尿路结石特征。我们对成功率的预测进行了 80%的训练集和 20%的测试集,主要使用基于决策树的机器学习算法,如随机森林(RF)、极端梯度提升树(XGBoost)和轻梯度提升法(LightGBM)。
在机器学习分析中,RF、XGBoost 和 LightGBM 对无结石的预测准确率分别为 86.0%、87.5%和 87.9%,对单次治疗成功的预测准确率分别为 78.0%、77.4%和 77.0%。在无结石的预测中,LightGBM 的准确率最高,而在单次治疗成功的预测中,RF 的准确率最高。机器学习分析的敏感性和特异性值分别为无结石(0.74 至 0.78 和 0.92 至 0.93)和单次治疗成功(0.79 至 0.81 和 0.74 至 0.75)。机器学习分析的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为无结石(0.84 至 0.85)和单次治疗成功(0.77 至 0.78),其 95%置信区间(CI)分别为平均方法的(0.730 至 0.933)和(0.673 至 0.866)。
我们应用了一种选定的机器学习分析来预测接受尿路结石 SWL 治疗后的结果。评估了大约 88%准确率的基于机器学习的预测模型。机器学习算法的重要性可以为 SWL 成功结果的有效和有影响力的因素提供匹配的领域知识。