Polonsky Jonny, Balabanova Dina, McPake Barbara, Poletti Timothy, Vyas Seema, Ghazaryan Olga, Yanni Mohga Kamal
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Health Policy Plan. 2009 May;24(3):209-16. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp001. Epub 2009 Feb 22.
Community health insurance (CHI) schemes are growing in importance in low-income settings, where health systems based on user fees have resulted in significant barriers to care for the poorest members of communities. They increase revenue, access and financial protection, but concerns have been expressed about the equity of such schemes and their ability to reach the poorest. Few programmes routinely evaluate equity impacts, even though this is usually a key objective. This lack of evidence is related to the difficulties in collecting reliable data on utilization and socio-economic status. This paper describes the findings of an evaluation of the equity of Oxfam's CHI schemes in rural Armenia.
Members of a random sample of 506 households in villages operating insurance schemes in rural Armenia were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Household wealth scores based on ownership of assets were generated using principal components analysis. Logistic and Poisson regression analyses were performed to identify the determinants of health facility utilization, and equity of access across socio-economic strata.
The schemes have achieved a high level of equity, according to socio-economic status, age and gender. However, although levels of participation compare favourably with international experience, they remain relatively low due to a lack of affordability and a package of primary care that does not include coverage for chronic disease.
This paper demonstrates that the distribution of benefits among members of this community-financing scheme is equitable, and that such a degree of equity in community insurance can be achieved in such settings, possibly through an emphasis on accountability and local management. Such a scheme presents a workable model for investing in primary health care in resource-poor settings.
社区医疗保险(CHI)计划在低收入地区的重要性日益凸显,在这些地区,基于使用者付费的卫生系统给社区最贫困成员获得医疗服务造成了重大障碍。这些计划增加了收入、扩大了医疗服务可及性并提供了经济保护,但人们对这类计划的公平性及其覆盖最贫困人口的能力表示担忧。尽管公平性通常是关键目标,但很少有项目定期评估公平性影响。缺乏这方面的证据与收集关于医疗服务利用情况和社会经济地位的可靠数据存在困难有关。本文介绍了对乐施会在亚美尼亚农村地区的社区医疗保险计划公平性评估的结果。
在亚美尼亚农村实施保险计划的村庄中,对506户家庭的随机样本成员进行了结构化问卷调查。使用主成分分析得出基于资产所有权的家庭财富得分。进行逻辑回归和泊松回归分析,以确定卫生设施利用的决定因素以及不同社会经济阶层的医疗服务可及性公平性。
根据社会经济地位、年龄和性别,这些计划实现了较高水平的公平性。然而,尽管参与水平与国际经验相比情况良好,但由于缺乏可负担性以及不包括慢性病保险的初级保健套餐,参与率仍然相对较低。
本文表明,这一社区筹资计划成员之间的福利分配是公平的,在这种环境下可以通过强调问责制和地方管理实现社区保险的这种公平程度。这样的计划为在资源匮乏地区投资初级卫生保健提供了一个可行的模式。