Suppr超能文献

农村医疗保险能否提高医疗服务利用的公平性?中越比较。

Can rural health insurance improve equity in health care utilization? A comparison between China and Vietnam.

机构信息

China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, PO box 505, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100191, PR China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2012 Feb 29;11:10. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health care financing reforms in both China and Vietnam have resulted in greater financial difficulties in accessing health care, especially for the rural poor. Both countries have been developing rural health insurance for decades. This study aims to evaluate and compare equity in access to health care in rural health insurance system in the two countries.

METHODS

Household survey and qualitative study were conducted in 6 counties in China and 4 districts in Vietnam. Health insurance policy and its impact on utilization of outpatient and inpatient service were analyzed and compared to measure equity in access to health care.

RESULTS

In China, Health insurance membership had no significant impact on outpatient service utilization, while was associated with higher utilization of inpatient services, especially for the higher income group. Health insurance members in Vietnam had higher utilization rates of both outpatient and inpatient services than the non-members, with higher use among the lower than higher income groups. Qualitative results show that bureaucratic obstacles, low reimbursement rates, and poor service quality were the main barriers for members to use health insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

China has achieved high population coverage rate over a short time period, starting with a limited benefit package. However, poor people have less benefit from NCMS in terms of health service utilization. Compared to China, Vietnam health insurance system is doing better in equity in health service utilization within the health insurance members. However with low population coverage, a large proportion of population cannot enjoy the health insurance benefit. Mutual learning would help China and Vietnam address these challenges, and improve their policy design to promote equitable and sustainable health insurance.

摘要

简介

中国和越南的医疗保健融资改革导致获得医疗保健的财务困难增加,尤其是农村贫困人口。两国几十年来一直在发展农村医疗保险。本研究旨在评估和比较两国农村医疗保险制度中获得医疗保健的公平性。

方法

在 6 个中国县和 4 个越南区进行了家庭调查和定性研究。分析了医疗保险政策及其对门诊和住院服务利用的影响,以衡量获得医疗保健的公平性。

结果

在中国,医疗保险参保对门诊服务利用没有显著影响,而与住院服务利用率较高相关,特别是对于高收入群体。越南的医疗保险参保者门诊和住院服务利用率均高于非参保者,低收入群体的利用率高于高收入群体。定性结果表明,官僚主义障碍、低报销率和服务质量差是参保者使用医疗保险的主要障碍。

结论

中国在短时间内实现了高人口覆盖率,从有限的福利套餐开始。然而,在卫生服务利用方面,穷人从新农合中获得的利益较少。与中国相比,越南的医疗保险制度在医疗保险参保者的卫生服务利用方面更公平。然而,由于人口覆盖率低,很大一部分人口无法享受医疗保险的好处。相互学习将有助于中国和越南应对这些挑战,并改进政策设计,以促进公平和可持续的医疗保险。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
The new cooperative medical scheme in China.中国新型农村合作医疗制度
Health Policy. 2009 Jun;91(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.11.012. Epub 2009 Jan 3.
6
Tackling the challenges to health equity in China.应对中国健康公平面临的挑战。
Lancet. 2008 Oct 25;372(9648):1493-501. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61364-1. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
7
Reform of how health care is paid for in China: challenges and opportunities.中国医疗保健支付方式的改革:挑战与机遇。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 22;372(9652):1846-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61368-9. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验