Cadmus S I B, Adesokan H K, Stack J
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2008 Sep;79(3):113-5. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v79i3.256.
In this study, milk and blood samples collected simultaneously from 532 trade cows to be slaughtered at Bodija abattoir, Ibadan (southwestern, Nigeria) were examined for antibodies to Brucella using the milk ring test (MRT) and the rose bengal test (RBT). Overall, 18.61% of the milk samples were positive according to the MRT, while 9.77% of the serum samples were positive according to the RBT. The difference was highly significant (Chi-square value 16.33; P < 0.05); only 32 (6.02%) of the samples were positive for both tests. The Red Bororo breed of cattle and the White Fulani had the highest positive rates, namely 20.93% and 11.69% for the MRT and RBT respectively. No conclusion can be drawn about sensitivity because we do not know the true status of the animals tested. It is, however, obvious that although the MRT and RBT are 1st-line screening tests for brucellosis in cows in some countries, their lack of specificity is of concern. Therefore, the requirement for other confirmatory tests that are more specific should be considered for control and eradication of the disease, especially in Nigeria.
在本研究中,从尼日利亚西南部伊巴丹博迪贾屠宰场即将被宰杀的532头商业奶牛身上同时采集了牛奶和血液样本,使用牛奶环状试验(MRT)和玫瑰红试验(RBT)检测布鲁氏菌抗体。总体而言,根据MRT,18.61%的牛奶样本呈阳性,而根据RBT,9.77%的血清样本呈阳性。差异具有高度显著性(卡方值16.33;P<0.05);只有32个(6.02%)样本两种检测均呈阳性。红牛品种和白富拉尼牛的阳性率最高,MRT和RBT分别为20.93%和11.69%。由于我们不知道所检测动物的真实状况,因此无法得出关于敏感性的结论。然而,很明显,尽管MRT和RBT在一些国家是奶牛布鲁氏菌病的一线筛查试验,但它们缺乏特异性令人担忧。因此,对于疾病的控制和根除,应考虑采用其他更具特异性的确证试验的要求,尤其是在尼日利亚。