Suppr超能文献

创伤患者使用负压封闭引流技术进行负压伤口治疗的早期干预:对住院时间和费用的影响。

Early intervention of negative pressure wound therapy using Vacuum-Assisted Closure in trauma patients: impact on hospital length of stay and cost.

作者信息

Kaplan Mark, Daly Darron, Stemkowski Stephen

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Mar;22(3):128-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305451.71811.d5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The cost of treating complex traumatic wounds is substantial because of trauma severity, potential for infection, and delayed closure. Negative pressure wound therapy using reticulated open cell foam (NPWT/ROCF) as delivered by Vacuum-Assisted Closure* (KCI Licensing, Inc, San Antonio, Texas) is an established, viable option for treating traumatic wounds. The authors used retrospective data to study the clinical and cost-effective benefits of using NPWT/ROCF early on day 1 or day 2 of treatment for traumatic wounds as compared with using it late (on day 3 or later).

METHODS

Hospital data records from trauma wound patients treated with NPWT/ROCF were retrospectively analyzed. Data were subdivided into 2 groups based on start of treatment. The group of patients treated on day 1 or 2 of their hospital stay was referred to as the early group, and that composed of patients treated on day 3 or later as the late group. Clinical and cost-effective metrics were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

For the early group, 518 patient records were included; 1000 records were reviewed for the late group. Early-group patients had fewer hospital inpatient days (10.6 vs 20.6 days; P < .0001), fewer treatment days (5.1 vs 6.0 days; P = .0498), shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stays (5.3 vs 12.4 days; P < .0001), and higher ICU admission rates (51.5 vs 44.5%; P = .0091) than the late group. Compared with late-group patients, early-group patients had lower total and variable costs per patient discharge ($43,956 vs $32,175; P < .0001 and $22,891 vs $15,805; P < .0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Acute-care trauma wound patients receiving early NPWT/ROCF demonstrated significant reductions in length of stay, treatment days, and ICU stay, which resulted in significant reduced patient treatment costs. These results indicate that early intervention with NPWT/ROCF has potential clinical and cost-effective benefits for the treatment of traumatic wounds.

摘要

目的

由于创伤严重程度、感染可能性以及延迟闭合等因素,治疗复杂创伤伤口的成本很高。使用网状开孔泡沫材料的负压伤口治疗(NPWT/ROCF),如由真空辅助闭合系统*(KCI授权公司,得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥)提供的,是治疗创伤伤口的一种既定且可行的选择。作者利用回顾性数据研究了在创伤伤口治疗的第1天或第2天早期使用NPWT/ROCF与晚期(第3天或更晚)使用相比的临床和成本效益优势。

方法

对接受NPWT/ROCF治疗的创伤伤口患者的医院数据记录进行回顾性分析。根据治疗开始时间将数据分为两组。住院第1天或第2天接受治疗的患者组称为早期组,第3天或更晚接受治疗的患者组称为晚期组。比较两组之间的临床和成本效益指标。

结果

早期组纳入了518份患者记录;晚期组审查了1000份记录。早期组患者的住院天数较少(10.6天对20.6天;P <.0001),治疗天数较少(5.1天对6.0天;P =.0498),重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间较短(5.3天对12.4天;P <.0001),且ICU入院率较高(51.5%对44.5%;P =.0091)。与晚期组患者相比,早期组患者每次出院的总费用和可变费用较低(分别为43,956美元对32,175美元;P <.0001和22,891美元对15,805美元;P <.0001)。

结论

接受早期NPWT/ROCF治疗的急性护理创伤伤口患者的住院时间、治疗天数和ICU住院时间显著缩短,从而使患者治疗成本显著降低。这些结果表明,早期采用NPWT/ROCF进行干预对创伤伤口治疗具有潜在的临床和成本效益优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验