Kaplan Mark, Daly Darron, Stemkowski Stephen
Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Mar;22(3):128-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305451.71811.d5.
The cost of treating complex traumatic wounds is substantial because of trauma severity, potential for infection, and delayed closure. Negative pressure wound therapy using reticulated open cell foam (NPWT/ROCF) as delivered by Vacuum-Assisted Closure* (KCI Licensing, Inc, San Antonio, Texas) is an established, viable option for treating traumatic wounds. The authors used retrospective data to study the clinical and cost-effective benefits of using NPWT/ROCF early on day 1 or day 2 of treatment for traumatic wounds as compared with using it late (on day 3 or later).
Hospital data records from trauma wound patients treated with NPWT/ROCF were retrospectively analyzed. Data were subdivided into 2 groups based on start of treatment. The group of patients treated on day 1 or 2 of their hospital stay was referred to as the early group, and that composed of patients treated on day 3 or later as the late group. Clinical and cost-effective metrics were compared between the 2 groups.
For the early group, 518 patient records were included; 1000 records were reviewed for the late group. Early-group patients had fewer hospital inpatient days (10.6 vs 20.6 days; P < .0001), fewer treatment days (5.1 vs 6.0 days; P = .0498), shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stays (5.3 vs 12.4 days; P < .0001), and higher ICU admission rates (51.5 vs 44.5%; P = .0091) than the late group. Compared with late-group patients, early-group patients had lower total and variable costs per patient discharge ($43,956 vs $32,175; P < .0001 and $22,891 vs $15,805; P < .0001, respectively).
Acute-care trauma wound patients receiving early NPWT/ROCF demonstrated significant reductions in length of stay, treatment days, and ICU stay, which resulted in significant reduced patient treatment costs. These results indicate that early intervention with NPWT/ROCF has potential clinical and cost-effective benefits for the treatment of traumatic wounds.
由于创伤严重程度、感染可能性以及延迟闭合等因素,治疗复杂创伤伤口的成本很高。使用网状开孔泡沫材料的负压伤口治疗(NPWT/ROCF),如由真空辅助闭合系统*(KCI授权公司,得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥)提供的,是治疗创伤伤口的一种既定且可行的选择。作者利用回顾性数据研究了在创伤伤口治疗的第1天或第2天早期使用NPWT/ROCF与晚期(第3天或更晚)使用相比的临床和成本效益优势。
对接受NPWT/ROCF治疗的创伤伤口患者的医院数据记录进行回顾性分析。根据治疗开始时间将数据分为两组。住院第1天或第2天接受治疗的患者组称为早期组,第3天或更晚接受治疗的患者组称为晚期组。比较两组之间的临床和成本效益指标。
早期组纳入了518份患者记录;晚期组审查了1000份记录。早期组患者的住院天数较少(10.6天对20.6天;P <.0001),治疗天数较少(5.1天对6.0天;P =.0498),重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间较短(5.3天对12.4天;P <.0001),且ICU入院率较高(51.5%对44.5%;P =.0091)。与晚期组患者相比,早期组患者每次出院的总费用和可变费用较低(分别为43,956美元对32,175美元;P <.0001和22,891美元对15,805美元;P <.0001)。
接受早期NPWT/ROCF治疗的急性护理创伤伤口患者的住院时间、治疗天数和ICU住院时间显著缩短,从而使患者治疗成本显著降低。这些结果表明,早期采用NPWT/ROCF进行干预对创伤伤口治疗具有潜在的临床和成本效益优势。