Morad Athir H, Winters Bradford D, Yaster Myron, Stevens Robert D, White Elizabeth D, Thompson Richard E, Weingart Jon D, Gottschalk Allan
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Meyer 8-134, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-4965, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2009 Aug;111(2):343-50. doi: 10.3171/2008.11.JNS08797.
Opioid administration following major intracranial surgery is often limited by a presumed lack of need and a concern that opioids will adversely affect postoperative outcome and interfere with the neurological examination. Nevertheless, evidence is accumulating that these patients suffer moderate to severe postoperative pain and that this pain is often undertreated. The authors hypothesized that intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) would safely and more effectively treat postoperative supratentorial craniotomy pain than conventional as needed (PRN) therapy.
Following a standardized course of general anesthesia, adult patients who underwent elective supratentorial intracranial surgery were randomized in the neurosciences intensive care unit to receive either PRN intravenous fentanyl 25-50 microg every 30 minutes or PCA intravenous fentanyl 0.5 microg/kg every 15 minutes (maximum 4 doses/hour). The authors measured pain (self-reported scale score [0-10]), sedation (Ramsay Sedation Scale score), Glasgow Coma Scale score, fentanyl use, and major adverse events (excessive sedation, respiratory depression, pruritus, nausea, or vomiting) hourly.
Sixty-four patients with a mean age of 48 years (range 22-77 years) were randomized to intravenous PCA (29 patients) or PRN fentanyl (35 patients) groups. There were no statistically significant demographic differences between the 2 groups. Patients receiving intravenous PCA had significantly lower pain scores than those receiving intravenous PRN fentanyl (2.53 +/- 1.96 vs 3.62 +/- 2.11 [p = 0.039]) and received significantly more fentanyl than the PRN group (44.1 +/- 34.5 vs 23.6 +/- 23.7 microg/hour [p = 0.007]). There were no differences between the 2 groups regarding the number of patients with adverse events.
Intravenous PCA more effectively treats the pain of supratentorial intracranial surgery than PRN fentanyl, and patients in the former group did not experience any untoward events related to the self-administration of opioids.
在大型颅内手术后使用阿片类药物常常受到假定的需求缺乏以及对阿片类药物会对术后结果产生不利影响并干扰神经学检查的担忧的限制。然而,越来越多的证据表明这些患者遭受中度至重度的术后疼痛,并且这种疼痛常常未得到充分治疗。作者推测静脉自控镇痛(PCA)比传统的按需(PRN)治疗能更安全、有效地治疗幕上开颅术后疼痛。
在接受标准化全身麻醉后,将接受择幕上颅内手术的成年患者在神经科学重症监护病房随机分组,分别每30分钟接受25 - 50微克按需静脉注射芬太尼,或每15分钟接受0.5微克/千克静脉注射芬太尼(最大4剂/小时)。作者每小时测量疼痛(自我报告量表评分[0 - 10])、镇静( Ramsay镇静量表评分)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、芬太尼使用量以及主要不良事件(过度镇静、呼吸抑制、瘙痒、恶心或呕吐)。
64名平均年龄为48岁(范围22 - 77岁)的患者被随机分为静脉PCA组(29例患者)或按需芬太尼组(35例患者)。两组之间在人口统计学上没有统计学显著差异。接受静脉PCA的患者疼痛评分显著低于接受静脉按需芬太尼的患者(2.53±1.96对3.62±2.11 [p = 0.039]),并且比按需组接受的芬太尼显著更多(44.1±34.5对23.6±23.7微克/小时 [p = 0.007])。两组之间在不良事件患者数量方面没有差异。
静脉PCA比按需芬太尼能更有效地治疗幕上颅内手术的疼痛,并且前一组患者未经历与阿片类药物自我给药相关的任何不良事件。