Kautzner Josef, Peichl Petr, Cihák Robert, Wichterle Dan, Mlcochová Hanka
Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S163-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02277.x.
Pulmonary venous antra isolation (PVAI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation procedure for drug refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the procedure is technically challenging. Robotic navigation has a potential to expedite and facilitate the procedure.
A robotic catheter control system was used for remote navigation-supported PVAI in 22 patients (mean age = 55 +/- 9 years, 16 males, study group). An irrigated-tip catheter with estimate of catheter force on the tissue was used. This was compared in nonrandomized fashion with conventional hand-controlled catheter ablation in 16 patients (mean age = 55 +/- 9 years, 13 males, control group). The procedures were performed under guidance of Ensite NavX navigation system (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and intracardiac echocardiography.
Robotic navigation was associated with significantly shorter overall duration of radiofrequency delivery (1,641 +/- 609 vs 2,188 +/- 865 seconds, P < 0.01), shorter total procedural time (207 +/- 29 vs 250 +/- 62 minutes, P = 0.007), fluoroscopy exposure (15 +/- 5 vs 27 +/- 9 minutes, P < 0.001), and lower radiation dose (1,119 +/- 596 vs 3,048 +/- 2,029 mGy/m(2), P < 0.001). No complication was observed in either the study or the control group. During the 5 +/- 1 months follow-up in the study group and 9 +/- 3 months in the control group, 91% and 81% of patients, respectively, were AF free.
In our early clinical experience, PVAI using a remote robotic catheter navigation was effective, safe, and associated with shorter procedural and fluoroscopic times than conventional PVAI.
肺静脉前庭隔离术(PVAI)是药物难治性阵发性心房颤动(AF)导管消融手术的基石。然而,该手术在技术上具有挑战性。机器人导航有可能加快并促进该手术。
在22例患者(平均年龄=55±9岁,男性16例,研究组)中使用机器人导管控制系统进行远程导航支持的PVAI。使用了带有组织导管力估计的灌注尖端导管。以非随机方式将其与16例患者(平均年龄=55±9岁,男性13例,对照组)的传统手动控制导管消融进行比较。手术在Ensite NavX导航系统(美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市圣犹达医疗公司)和心内超声心动图引导下进行。
机器人导航与显著缩短的射频发放总时长相关(1641±609秒对2188±865秒,P<0.01),总手术时间更短(207±29分钟对250±62分钟,P=0.007),透视暴露时间更短(15±5分钟对27±9分钟,P<0.001),辐射剂量更低(1119±596对3048±2029 mGy/m²,P<0.001)。研究组和对照组均未观察到并发症。在研究组5±1个月的随访期和对照组9±3个月的随访期内,分别有91%和81%的患者无房颤。
在我们的早期临床经验中,使用远程机器人导管导航的PVAI是有效、安全的,并且与传统PVAI相比,手术和透视时间更短。