• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波前引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中虹膜定位矫正混合性散光。

Iris registration in wavefront-guided LASIK to correct mixed astigmatism.

作者信息

Khalifa Mounir, El-Kateb Mohamed, Shaheen Mohamed Shafik

机构信息

Tanta University Khalifa, Tanta, Egypt.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.039.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.039
PMID:19251134
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictability, safety, and efficiency of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with iris-registration technology to correct mixed astigmatism.

SETTING

Vision correction center, Alexandria, Egypt.

METHODS

This retrospective double-blind study included randomly selected patients with mixed astigmatism who sought laser refractive surgery. Patients were divided equally into 3 groups and treated with conventional LASIK and manual marking, wavefront-guided LASIK and manual marking, or wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration (LASIK+IR group). Eyes were analyzed preoperatively and up to 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The LASIK+IR group had better postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (100% 20/30 or better; 90% 20/20 or better; 20% 20/16 or better) than the other groups and did not lose preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, unlike the other groups. This group also had the highest percentage of eyes that gained lines of acuity (20% 1 line; 10% 2 lines). The LASIK+IR group had the highest predictability of spherical refraction (80% within +/-0.50 diopter [D]; 100% within +/-1.00 D [P<.05] and the highest predictability of cylinder refraction. The LASIK+IR eyes had a significantly smaller increase postoperatively in coma, trefoil, and secondary astigmatism. There was no significant difference between groups in spherical aberration or quadrafoil. The LASIK-IR group had the most improvement in scotopic contrast sensitivity (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration was more predictable, safe, and efficient than conventional or wavefront-guided LASIK with manual marking in correcting mixed astigmatism. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

探讨采用虹膜定位技术的波前像差引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)矫正混合性散光的可预测性、安全性和有效性。

设置

埃及亚历山大视力矫正中心。

方法

这项回顾性双盲研究纳入了随机选择的寻求激光屈光手术的混合性散光患者。患者被平均分为3组,分别接受传统LASIK和手动标记、波前像差引导LASIK和手动标记,或采用虹膜定位的波前像差引导LASIK(LASIK+IR组)。术前及术后3个月对眼睛进行分析。

结果

与其他组相比,LASIK+IR组术后裸眼视力更好(100%达到20/30或更好;90%达到20/20或更好;20%达到20/16或更好),且与其他组不同,未丧失术前最佳矫正视力。该组中视力提高行数的眼睛比例也最高(20%提高1行;10%提高2行)。LASIK+IR组的球镜屈光度预测性最高(80%在±0.50屈光度[D]范围内;100%在±1.00 D范围内[P<0.05]),柱镜屈光度预测性也最高。LASIK+IR组的眼睛术后彗差、三叶草像差和继发性散光增加明显更小。各组之间在球差或四叶草像差方面无显著差异。LASIK-IR组在暗视对比敏感度方面改善最大(P<0.05)。

结论

在矫正混合性散光方面,采用虹膜定位的波前像差引导LASIK比传统或波前像差引导的手动标记LASIK更具可预测性、安全性和有效性。需要进一步研究来证实这些结果。

相似文献

1
Iris registration in wavefront-guided LASIK to correct mixed astigmatism.波前引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中虹膜定位矫正混合性散光。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.039.
2
Manual limbal markings versus iris-registration software for correction of myopic astigmatism by laser in situ keratomileusis.手动角膜缘标记与虹膜注册软件在 LASIK 治疗近视散光中的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Mar;36(3):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.030.
3
Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.传统准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与虹膜定位的波前引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术视觉性能的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Jan 20;121(2):137-42.
4
Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with and without iris registration.有虹膜配准和无虹膜配准的波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术后的视觉效果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1532-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.025.
5
Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for consecutive hyperopia and compound hyperopic astigmatism.波前像差引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术再次治疗连续性远视和复合性远视散光
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.026.
6
[Comparative clinical study of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with versus without iris recognition for myopia or myopic astigmatism].[波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术联合与不联合虹膜识别治疗近视或近视散光的临床对比研究]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;47(10):927-33.
7
Evaluation of iris recognition system for wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism.用于波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视散光的虹膜识别系统评估
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.022.
8
Excimer laser correction of moderate to high astigmatism with a non-wavefront-guided aberration-free ablation profile: Six-month results.采用非波前引导的无像差消融模式的准分子激光矫正中度至高度散光:六个月结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Oct;35(10):1789-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.035.
9
Comparison of Collamer toric implantable [corrected] contact lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopic astigmatism.用于高度近视散光的Collamer散光可植入式[矫正]隐形眼镜植入术与波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Oct;34(10):1687-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.030.
10
Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.波前引导与标准准分子原位角膜磨镶术对残余屈光不正的增效治疗
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Flap Elevation on the Ocular Cyclotorsion in Customized Laser Ablation.瓣片抬高对定制激光消融术中眼旋转扭转的影响。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 10;14(8):2596. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082596.
2
The impact of static cyclotorsion correction using on photorefractive keratectomy outcomes in patients with moderate and high astigmatism.使用静态旋转性斜视矫正对中高度散光患者准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术结果的影响。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 30;45(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03490-w.
3
Comparison of visual quality after wavefront-guided LASIK in patients with different levels of preoperative total ocular higher-order aberrations: a retrospective study.
不同术前总眼高阶像差水平患者行波前引导 LASIK 术后视觉质量比较:一项回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Aug 21;12:e17940. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17940. eCollection 2024.
4
Feasibility study of treatment of mixed astigmatism with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) by using research software.基于研究软件评估小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)治疗混合性散光的可行性研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;72(7):1056-1063. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1273_23. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
5
Refractive Outcomes After LASIK for the Treatment of Mixed Astigmatism with the Allegretto WaveLight EX500.Allegretto WaveLight EX500准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗混合性散光后的屈光效果
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Apr;11(2):785-795. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00472-4. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.波前像差引导的准分子激光屈光手术治疗屈光不正的成年人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 18;12(12):CD012687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012687.pub2.
7
The Impact of Image Registration for Ablation Orientation on Clinical Outcomes After Wavefront-Optimized Refractive Surgery in Eyes with Myopia and Astigmatism.近视和散光眼波前优化屈光手术后,图像配准用于消融定位对临床结果的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov 17;14:3983-3990. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S280818. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparison of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery With and Without Cyclotorsion Error Correction for Patients With Astigmatism.散光患者小切口透镜切除术有无睫状肌扭转误差校正的比较。
Cornea. 2019 Jun;38(6):723-729. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001937.
9
Correlation between iris-registered static and dynamic cyclotorsions with preoperative refractive astigmatism in PRK candidates.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)候选者中虹膜定位的静态和动态旋转斜视与术前屈光性散光之间的相关性
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 6;31(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2018.10.006. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
Control-matched comparison of refractive and visual outcomes between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.小切口透镜切除术与飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术屈光及视觉效果的对照匹配比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 May 10;12:865-873. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S161883. eCollection 2018.