• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与虹膜定位的波前引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术视觉性能的比较。

Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.

作者信息

Zhang Jing, Zhou Yue-hua, Wang Ning-li, Li Rui

机构信息

Ophthalmic Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Jan 20;121(2):137-42.

PMID:18272040
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has become an efficient and commonly performed procedure to reduce refractive errors. In order to further increase the postoperative visual quality, the wavefront-guided refractive surgery has been a research hotspot in customized surgery. This study was conducted to compare the visual acuity, higher-order aberration, and contrast sensitivity of wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration and conventional LASIK.

METHODS

Two hundred and eleven myopic eyes of 109 patients were enrolled in this prospective study and randomly divided into two groups: the wavefront-guided LASIK (wg LASIK) group (94 eyes) and conventional LASIK group (117 eyes). A Wavescan Wavefront aberrometer was used to analyze Zernike coefficients and the root-mean-square (RMS) of higher order aberrations with 6.0 mm pupil size, and Optec 6500 visual function instrument was used to measure contrast sensitivity (CS) under 5 spatial frequencies before and after surgery in both groups.

RESULTS

The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and the mean spherical equivalent (SE) in wg LASIK group were significantly better than those in conventional LASIK (UCVA, z = 2.339, P = 0.019; SE, t = 2.838, P = 0.005) at 3 months after surgery. Moreover, the increase in Z(3)(-3), Z(3)(1), Z(3)(3), Z(4)(0), Z(5)(-1), Z(5)(1), Z(5)(5) and Z(6)(-6) in wg LASIK group was statistically smaller than that in conventional LASIK group (P < 0.05). In wg LASIK group, eyes with a higher amount of the preoperative RMS of the higher order aberrations (RMSh = 0.30 microm) showed a statistically lower increase (13.5%) than those in conventional LASIK group at 3 months after surgery (33.3%) (P = 0.004). And the values of 4th order spherical aberration (4thSA) and the root mean square of 6th order aberration (RMS6) in wg LASIK group were significantly lower than those in conventional group in eyes which had higher preoperative astigmatism (= 1.0D) (4thSA, P = 0.03; RMS6, P = 0.02). Wg LASIK group showed better CS values than the correspondingly preoperative values at all spatial frequencies with and without glare at 3 months after the surgery while conventional LASIK group displayed reduced CS values except for 1.5 and 3 cycles per degree with glare. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration is efficient to reduce higher order aberrations especially spherical and coma aberrations, and to improve postoperative visual acuity and contrast sensitivity compared with conventional LASIK. The application of wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration is particularly suitable for eyes with higher preoperative RMSh values and eyes with higher preoperative astigmatism.

摘要

背景

准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)已成为矫正屈光不正的一种有效且常用的手术方法。为了进一步提高术后视觉质量,波前像差引导的屈光手术已成为个性化手术的研究热点。本研究旨在比较波前像差引导的虹膜定位LASIK与传统LASIK的视力、高阶像差和对比敏感度。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了109例患者的211只近视眼,随机分为两组:波前像差引导的LASIK(wg LASIK)组(94只眼)和传统LASIK组(117只眼)。使用Wavescan波前像差仪分析6.0mm瞳孔直径下的泽尼克系数和高阶像差的均方根(RMS),并使用Optec 6500视觉功能仪测量两组患者手术前后5个空间频率下的对比敏感度(CS)。

结果

术后3个月,wg LASIK组的裸眼视力(UCVA)和平均球镜当量(SE)显著优于传统LASIK组(UCVA,z = 2.339,P = 0.019;SE,t = 2.838,P = 0.005)。此外,wg LASIK组Z(3)(-3)、Z(3)(1)、Z(3)(3)、Z(4)(0)、Z(5)(-1)、Z(5)(1)、Z(5)(5)和Z(6)(-6)的增加在统计学上小于传统LASIK组(P < 0.05)。在wg LASIK组中,术前高阶像差RMS较高(RMSh = 0.30μm)的眼睛术后3个月的增加幅度(13.5%)在统计学上低于传统LASIK组(33.3%)(P = 0.004)。在术前散光较高(≥1.0D)的眼睛中,wg LASIK组的四阶球差(4thSA)和六阶像差均方根(RMS6)值显著低于传统组(4thSA,P = 0.03;RMS6,P = 0.02)。术后3个月,在所有空间频率下,无论有无眩光,wg LASIK组的CS值均优于相应的术前值;而传统LASIK组除了在有眩光时1.5和3周/度的空间频率外,CS值均降低。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。

结论

与传统LASIK相比,波前像差引导的虹膜定位LASIK能有效降低高阶像差,尤其是球差和彗差,并提高术后视力和对比敏感度。波前像差引导的虹膜定位LASIK特别适用于术前RMSh值较高的眼睛和术前散光较高的眼睛。

相似文献

1
Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.传统准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与虹膜定位的波前引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术视觉性能的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Jan 20;121(2):137-42.
2
[Comparative clinical study of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis with versus without iris recognition for myopia or myopic astigmatism].[波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术联合与不联合虹膜识别治疗近视或近视散光的临床对比研究]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;47(10):927-33.
3
Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.波前引导与标准准分子原位角膜磨镶术对残余屈光不正的增效治疗
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
4
Iris registration in wavefront-guided LASIK to correct mixed astigmatism.波前引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中虹膜定位矫正混合性散光。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.039.
5
Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis.准分子原位角膜磨镶术后瞳孔直径对眼高阶像差与对比敏感度关系的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Apr;47(4):1334-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1154.
6
[Contrast sensitivity and higher order aberration after conventional LASIK treatment].[传统准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后的对比敏感度和高阶像差]
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2009 Oct;65(5):167-75.
7
Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.波前引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术后高阶像差的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):779-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.033.
8
[Correction and induction of high-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided LASIK and their influence on the postoperative contrast sensitivity].[标准LASIK和波前引导LASIK术后高阶像差的矫正与诱导及其对术后对比敏感度的影响]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006 Mar;223(3):217-24. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858864.
9
Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.波前引导与波前优化准分子原位角膜磨镶术:对侧对比研究
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Mar;34(3):389-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.028.
10
Higher-order aberrations in eyes with irregular corneas after laser refractive surgery.激光屈光手术后不规则角膜眼的高阶像差
Ophthalmology. 2005 Oct;112(10):1699-709. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.04.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of visual quality after wavefront-guided LASIK in patients with different levels of preoperative total ocular higher-order aberrations: a retrospective study.不同术前总眼高阶像差水平患者行波前引导 LASIK 术后视觉质量比较:一项回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Aug 21;12:e17940. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17940. eCollection 2024.
2
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.波前像差引导的准分子激光屈光手术治疗屈光不正的成年人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 18;12(12):CD012687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012687.pub2.
3
Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations after Wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK: One Year Follow-Up Results.
波前引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)后高阶像差的比较:一年随访结果
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016 Oct-Dec;11(4):350-357. doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.194069.
4
Effect of wavefront optimized LASIK on higher order aberrations in myopic patients.波前像差优化准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术对近视患者高阶像差的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Sep-Oct;31(5):1223-6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.315.7683.
5
Visual performance after conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration: results at 1 year.传统准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与虹膜定位的波前像差引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术术后的视觉表现:1年结果
Int J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug 18;6(4):498-504. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.04.17. eCollection 2013.
6
Aspheric wavefront-guided versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the Technolas 217z100 excimer laser.非球面波前引导与波前引导 LASIK 治疗伴Technolas 217z100 准分子激光的近视性散光。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;251(2):609-16. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2143-0. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
7
Response to: Comparison of higher-order aberration and optical quality after Epi-LASIK and LASIK for myopia.回应:准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术(Epi-LASIK)与准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视后高阶像差与光学质量的比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;249(10):1559-60. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1515-6. Epub 2010 Sep 19.