• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

投资保护:内在价值与工具价值

Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value.

作者信息

Justus James, Colyvan Mark, Regan Helen, Maguire Lynn

机构信息

Philosophy Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Apr;24(4):187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.011
PMID:19251339
Abstract

Many conservation biologists believe the best ethical basis for conserving natural entities is their claimed intrinsic value, not their instrumental value for humans. But there is significant confusion about what intrinsic value is and how it could govern conservation decision making. After examining what intrinsic value is supposed to be, we argue that it cannot guide the decision making conservation requires. An adequate ethical basis for conservation must do this, and instrumental value does it best.

摘要

许多保护生物学家认为,保护自然实体的最佳伦理基础是其所谓的内在价值,而非对人类的工具价值。但对于什么是内在价值以及它如何能够指导保护决策,存在着很大的困惑。在审视了内在价值应为何物之后,我们认为它无法指导保护工作所需的决策。保护工作需要一个适当的伦理基础来做到这一点,而工具价值在这方面做得最好。

相似文献

1
Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value.投资保护:内在价值与工具价值
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Apr;24(4):187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
2
Intrinsic value: a reply to Justus et al.内在价值:对贾斯特斯等人的回应
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Dec;24(12):643; author reply 644. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
3
Biodiversity, conservation biology, and rational choice.生物多样性、保护生物学与理性选择。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2014 Mar;45:101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
4
Is adaptive co-management ethical?
J Environ Manage. 2008 Jul;88(1):62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.020. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
5
Confronting uncertainty and missing values in environmental value transfer as applied to species conservation.面对应用于物种保护的环境价值转移中的不确定性和缺失值。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Oct;24(5):1407-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01489.x.
6
Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity.保护城市生物多样性的动机。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Apr;24(2):432-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01328.x. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
7
Environmental economic, political and ethical integration in a common decision-making framework.在一个共同的决策框架中实现环境、经济、政治和伦理的整合。
J Environ Manage. 2008 Jul;88(1):154-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
8
Embracing opportunism in the selection of priority conservation areas.在优先保护区的选择中采用机会主义。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):1124-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00690.x.
9
On the compatibility of a conservation ethic with biological science.论保护伦理与生物科学的兼容性。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Apr;21(2):337-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00634.x.
10
Conservation as virtue: a scientific and social process for conservation ethics.作为美德的保护:保护伦理的科学与社会进程。
Conserv Biol. 2006 Oct;20(5):1367-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00447.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring perceived fitness interdependence between humans and non-humans.衡量人类与非人类之间感知到的健康相互依存关系。
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Feb 27;6:e16. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.10. eCollection 2024.
2
Why nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values.自然为何重要:对内在价值、工具价值和关系价值的系统综述。
Bioscience. 2023 Dec 26;74(1):25-43. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biad109. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Towards a more healthy conservation paradigm: integrating disease and molecular ecology to aid biological conservation.
迈向更健康的保护范式:整合疾病和分子生态学以辅助生物保护。
J Genet. 2020;99(1). doi: 10.1007/s12041-020-01225-7.
4
Impact of biological education and gender on students' connection to nature and relational values.生物教育和性别对学生与自然的联系和关系价值观的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0242004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242004. eCollection 2020.
5
In defence of biodiversity.为生物多样性辩护。
Biol Philos. 2017;32(6):969-997. doi: 10.1007/s10539-017-9587-x. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
6
Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia.谁在乎森林,为何在乎?亚马孙地区后边疆地带森林的个人价值
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 12;11(12):e0167691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167691. eCollection 2016.
7
Finding Common Ground: Environmental Ethics, Social Justice, and a Sustainable Path for Nature-Based Health Promotion.寻找共同点:环境伦理、社会正义与基于自然的健康促进的可持续路径。
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Aug 25;4(3):61. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030061.
8
The global economic impact of manta ray watching tourism.蝠鲼观赏旅游业的全球经济影响。
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e65051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065051. Print 2013.
9
Assessing global marine biodiversity status within a coupled socio-ecological perspective.从社会-生态关联角度评估全球海洋生物多样性状况。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 11;8(4):e60284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060284. Print 2013.
10
The candid approach. Scientists should insist on a purely scientific approach to preserving biodiversity.坦诚的方法。科学家应该坚持以纯粹的科学方法来保护生物多样性。
EMBO Rep. 2010 Jan;11(1):14-7. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.261. Epub 2009 Dec 11.