• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别、归因和严重程度影响家庭暴力中非正式帮助者的干预决策。

Sex, attribution, and severity influence intervention decisions of informal helpers in domestic violence.

机构信息

New England College, Department of Psychology, 98 Bridge Street, Henniker, NH 03242, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2009 Oct;24(10):1696-713. doi: 10.1177/0886260509331514. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1177/0886260509331514
PMID:19252071
Abstract

Most domestic violence (DV) researchers examine professional intervention (e.g., police and nurses), but informal helpers (e.g., friends and bystanders) are critical. The authors measure undergraduates' intervention likelihood, type of involvement (i.e., contact with abuser), and the influence of attribution decisions in DV situations where the abuser's sex is manipulated. Self-esteem and other personal variables are not found to be influential, but participants intervene more when the abuser is male and if they have experienced childhood abuse. The influence of attributions in DV situations is influenced by the sex of the attacker and severity of the attack. Participants' attributions for male attackers predict intervention in severe cases of DV; attributions of drunkenness predict more intervention. In general, informal male helpers choose more risky types of intervention than female helpers do, and more aggressive individuals choose less helpful behaviors than those lower in aggression. Stigma reduction associated with DV and intervention, especially among male victims, and the importance of encouraging appropriate involvement among helpers are discussed.

摘要

大多数家庭暴力(DV)研究人员研究专业干预(如警察和护士),但非正式帮助者(如朋友和旁观者)也很关键。作者衡量了大学生的干预可能性、参与类型(即与施虐者的接触),以及在施虐者性别被操纵的 DV 情况下归因决策的影响。研究发现,自尊和其他个人变量没有影响,但当施虐者是男性且参与者有过童年虐待经历时,他们的干预会更多。DV 情况下归因的影响受攻击者的性别和攻击的严重程度的影响。参与者对男性攻击者的归因预测了严重的 DV 情况下的干预;归因于醉酒预测了更多的干预。一般来说,非正式的男性帮助者比女性帮助者选择更具风险的干预类型,攻击性较低的个体比攻击性较高的个体选择帮助性较小的行为。讨论了与 DV 和干预相关的耻辱感降低,特别是在男性受害者中,以及鼓励帮助者适当参与的重要性。

相似文献

1
Sex, attribution, and severity influence intervention decisions of informal helpers in domestic violence.性别、归因和严重程度影响家庭暴力中非正式帮助者的干预决策。
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Oct;24(10):1696-713. doi: 10.1177/0886260509331514. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
2
Relationship between recent life events, social supports, and attitudes to domestic violence: predictive roles in behaviors.近期生活事件、社会支持与对家庭暴力的态度之间的关系:对行为的预测作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 May;25(5):863-76. doi: 10.1177/0886260509336959. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
3
Empowering bystanders to prevent campus violence against women: a preliminary evaluation of a poster campaign.增强旁观者预防校园内针对女性暴力行为的能力:一项海报宣传活动的初步评估
Violence Against Women. 2009 Jan;15(1):106-21. doi: 10.1177/1077801208327482.
4
Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: a review of the literature.亲密伴侣暴力向非正式社会支持网络成员的披露:文献综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014 Jan;15(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/1524838013496335. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
5
Public stigma in health and non-healthcare students: attributions, emotions and willingness to help with adolescent self-harm.健康专业与非健康专业学生的公众污名:对青少年自我伤害的归因、情绪及帮助意愿
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jan;46(1):107-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.014. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
6
Skin cancer risk and sun protection learning by helpers of patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer.非黑色素瘤皮肤癌患者的辅助人员对皮肤癌风险及防晒的认知
Prev Med. 1995 Jul;24(4):333-41. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1055.
7
Using social self-identification in social marketing materials aimed at reducing violence against women on campus.在针对减少校园内针对妇女的暴力行为的社会营销材料中使用社会自我认同。
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Mar;26(5):971-90. doi: 10.1177/0886260510365870. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
8
A survey of police officers' and prosecutors' beliefs about crime victim behaviors.警察和检察官对犯罪受害者行为的认知调查。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Jun;25(6):1132-49. doi: 10.1177/0886260509340535. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
9
Interpersonal violence cases reported to the police: a Nigerian study.向警方报告的人际暴力案件:一项尼日利亚的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2005 Dec;20(12):1598-610. doi: 10.1177/0886260505280348.
10
Self-reported disciplinary practices among women in the child welfare system: association with domestic violence victimization.儿童福利系统中女性自我报告的纪律处分措施:与遭受家庭暴力的关联
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Aug;32(8):811-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.12.004. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Intention to Act: Predicting Bystander Intervention in Violent Situations in South Korea.行为意向:预测韩国暴力情境中的旁观者干预。
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Jan;40(1-2):252-278. doi: 10.1177/08862605241246797. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
2
Bystander Intervention in Coercive Control: Do Relationship to the Victim, Bystander Gender, and Concerns Influence Willingness to Intervene?旁观者干预强制性控制:与受害者的关系、旁观者的性别和关注因素是否会影响干预意愿?
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug;39(15-16):3791-3815. doi: 10.1177/08862605241234350. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
(Mis)Perceptions of bystander behaviors and approval: The role of gender-specific perceived norms.
旁观者行为与认可的(错误)认知:特定性别感知规范的作用
Psychol Violence. 2023 Jul;13(4):329-337. doi: 10.1037/vio0000468. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
4
A systematic review of informal supporters of intimate partner violence survivors: the intimate partner violence model of informal supporter readiness.亲密关系暴力幸存者非正式支持者的系统评价:非正式支持者准备度的亲密关系暴力模型。
PeerJ. 2023 May 9;11:e15160. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15160. eCollection 2023.
5
Firearms and protective orders in intimate partner homicides.亲密伴侣杀人案中的枪支与保护令
J Fam Violence. 2021;36:587-596. doi: 10.1007/s10896-020-00165-1. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
6
Feminist or Paternalistic: Understanding Men's Motivations to Confront Sexism.女权主义还是家长式作风:理解男性对抗性别歧视的动机。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 17;10:2988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02988. eCollection 2019.
7
Changing the norms that drive intimate partner violence: findings from a cluster randomised trial on what predisposes bystanders to take action in Kampala, Uganda.改变助长亲密伴侣暴力行为的规范:一项关于在乌干达坎帕拉促使旁观者采取行动的因素的整群随机试验的结果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 14;3(6):e001109. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001109. eCollection 2018.
8
Establishing the Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Among Hair Salon Clients.调查发廊客户中亲密伴侣暴力的流行情况。
J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):348-355. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0429-1.
9
Teens' Self-Efficacy to Deal with Dating Violence as Victim, Perpetrator or Bystander.青少年作为受害者、施暴者或旁观者应对约会暴力的自我效能感。
Int Rev Vict. 2014 Sep;20(3):289-303. doi: 10.1177/0269758014521741.
10
Bystander Intervention Among College Men: The Role of Alcohol and Correlates of Sexual Aggression.大学男生中的旁观者干预:酒精的作用及性侵犯的相关因素
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Oct;31(17):2824-46. doi: 10.1177/0886260515581904. Epub 2015 May 5.