• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“炮友关系”:男性和女性理想交配策略之间的妥协。

The "booty call": a compromise between men's and women's ideal mating strategies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;46(5):460-70. doi: 10.1080/00224490902775827.

DOI:10.1080/00224490902775827
PMID:19253133
Abstract

Traditionally, research on romantic and sexual relationships has focused on one-night stands and monogamous pairs. However, as the result of men and women pursuing their ideal relationship types, various compromise relationships may emerge. One such compromise is explored here: the "booty call." The results of an act-nomination and frequency study of college students provided an initial definition and exploration of this type of relationship. Booty calls tend to utilize various communication mediums to facilitate sexual contact among friends who, for men, may represent low-investment, attractive sexual partners and, for women, may represent attractive test-mates. The relationship is discussed as a compromise between men's and women's ideal mating strategies that allows men greater sexual access and women an ongoing opportunity to evaluate potential long-term mates.

摘要

传统上,关于浪漫关系和性关系的研究集中在一夜情和一夫一妻制伴侣上。然而,由于男性和女性都在追求自己理想的关系类型,各种妥协关系可能会出现。这里探讨的一种妥协关系是“炮友关系”。对大学生的行为提名和频率研究的结果提供了对这种关系的初步定义和探索。炮友关系往往利用各种沟通媒介来促进朋友之间的性接触,对男性来说,这些朋友可能代表着低投入、有吸引力的性伴侣,对女性来说,这些朋友可能代表着有吸引力的测试对象。这种关系被讨论为男性和女性理想交配策略之间的妥协,这使得男性有更多的性机会,而女性则有持续的机会来评估潜在的长期伴侣。

相似文献

1
The "booty call": a compromise between men's and women's ideal mating strategies.“炮友关系”:男性和女性理想交配策略之间的妥协。
J Sex Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;46(5):460-70. doi: 10.1080/00224490902775827.
2
Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: sexual but more emotional than one-night stands.将一夜情关系定位在关系谱上:有性,但比一夜情更有感情。
J Sex Res. 2011 Sep;48(5):486-95. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.497984. Epub 2011 May 24.
3
Actual and desired duration of foreplay and intercourse: discordance and misperceptions within heterosexual couples.前戏和性交的实际时长与期望时长:异性恋伴侣间的差异与误解
J Sex Res. 2004 Aug;41(3):301-9. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552237.
4
Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.Netflix 约会看片?性别差异能告诉我们关于(假设的)炮友关系中伴侣偏好的什么信息。
Evol Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):1474704918812138. doi: 10.1177/1474704918812138.
5
Sexual partnership patterns as a behavioral risk factor for sexually transmitted diseases.性伴侣模式作为性传播疾病的行为危险因素。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):228-36.
6
Four functions for four relationships: consensus definitions of university students.四种关系的四项功能:大学生的共识定义
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Nov;42(8):1407-14. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0189-7. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
7
Evaluations and Future Plans After Casual Sexual Experiences: Differences Across Partner Type.随意性行为体验后的评估和未来计划:伴侣类型的差异。
J Sex Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;55(9):1180-1191. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1298714. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
8
Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.从进化角度看同性恋的交配偏好:重探性选择理论
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Oct;36(5):717-23. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9216-x. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
9
Romantic red: red enhances men's attraction to women.浪漫的红色:红色增强男性对女性的吸引力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1150-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1150.
10
Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system.孔雀、保时捷和索尔斯坦·凡勃伦:炫耀性消费作为一种性信号系统。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Apr;100(4):664-80. doi: 10.1037/a0021669.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple Casual Sex Scripts: Shared Beliefs about Behavior among Portuguese Emerging Adults.多种随意性行为脚本:葡萄牙新兴成年人对性行为的共同信念
Int J Sex Health. 2023 Feb 2;35(1):105-122. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2023.2172512. eCollection 2023.
2
Sexual Behaviors, Satisfaction, and Intentions to Engage in Casual Sexual Relationships and Experiences in Emerging Adulthood.性行为、满意度以及在成年初期发生随意性关系和体验的意愿。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1575-1591. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02508-z. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
3
A Fertile Ground for Ambiguities: Casual Sexual Relationships Among Portuguese Emerging Adults.
模糊不清的温床:葡萄牙新兴成年人中的随意性关系
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 18;13:823102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823102. eCollection 2022.
4
Clear-Cut Terms and Culture-Sensitive Characteristics of Distinctive Casual Sexual Relationships in Portuguese Emerging Adults.葡萄牙新兴成年人中独特随意性关系的明确术语和文化敏感特征
Sex Cult. 2021;25(6):1966-1989. doi: 10.1007/s12119-021-09859-0. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
5
Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.挪威男女在短期关系中看重相似的伴侣特征。
Evol Psychol. 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):1474704920979623. doi: 10.1177/1474704920979623.
6
Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.Netflix 约会看片?性别差异能告诉我们关于(假设的)炮友关系中伴侣偏好的什么信息。
Evol Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):1474704918812138. doi: 10.1177/1474704918812138.
7
Alcohol Use and Risk Factors for Sexual Aggression: Differences According to Relationship Status.酒精使用与性侵犯风险因素:根据关系状态的差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):NP5125-NP5147. doi: 10.1177/0886260518795169. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
8
Evaluations and Future Plans After Casual Sexual Experiences: Differences Across Partner Type.随意性行为体验后的评估和未来计划:伴侣类型的差异。
J Sex Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;55(9):1180-1191. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1298714. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Adolescent intimate heterosexual relationships: measurement issues.青少年异性亲密关系:测量问题。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013 Feb;26(1):3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Nov 16.