Patel Deena-Shefali, Sharma Atul, Prendergast Michael, Rafferty Gerrard F, Greenough Anne
Division of Asthma, Allergy, and Lung Biology, King's College London School of Medicine, London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom.
Pediatrics. 2009 Apr;123(4):e679-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2635. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
The objectives of this study were to determine the impact of different volume-targeted levels on the work of breathing and to investigate whether a level that reduced the work of breathing below that experienced during ventilatory support without volume targeting could be determined.
The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product, as an estimate of the work of breathing, was measured for 20 infants (median gestational age: 28 weeks) who were being weaned from respiratory support by using patient-triggered ventilation (either assist-control ventilation or synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation). The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was measured first without volume targeting (baseline) and then at volume-targeted levels of 4, 5, and 6 mL/kg, delivered in random order. After each volume-targeted level, the infants were returned to baseline. Each step was maintained for 20 minutes.
The mean transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was higher with volume targeting at 4 mL/kg in comparison with baseline, regardless of the patient-triggered mode. The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was higher at a volume-targeted level of 4 mL/kg in comparison with 5 mL/kg and at 5 mL/kg in comparison with 6 mL/kg. The mean work of breathing was below that at baseline only at a volume-targeted level of 6 mL/kg.
Low volume-targeted levels increase the work of breathing during volume-targeted ventilation. Our results suggest that, during weaning, a volume-targeted level of 6 mL/kg, rather than a lower level, could be used to avoid an increase in the work of breathing.
本研究的目的是确定不同容量目标水平对呼吸功的影响,并调查是否能确定一个能将呼吸功降低至低于无容量目标通气支持时所经历水平的目标水平。
对20名婴儿(中位胎龄:28周)进行了经膈压 - 时间乘积的测量,这些婴儿正在通过患者触发通气(辅助控制通气或同步间歇指令通气)撤离呼吸支持。首先在无容量目标时(基线)测量经膈压 - 时间乘积,然后以随机顺序在4、5和6 mL/kg的容量目标水平下进行测量。在每个容量目标水平之后,婴儿恢复到基线状态。每个步骤维持20分钟。
无论患者触发模式如何,与基线相比,4 mL/kg容量目标时的平均经膈压 - 时间乘积更高。与5 mL/kg相比,4 mL/kg容量目标水平下的经膈压 - 时间乘积更高,与6 mL/kg相比,5 mL/kg时的经膈压 - 时间乘积更高。仅在6 mL/kg的容量目标水平下,平均呼吸功低于基线水平。
低容量目标水平会增加容量目标通气期间的呼吸功。我们的结果表明,在撤离过程中,6 mL/kg的容量目标水平而非更低水平可用于避免呼吸功增加。