Suppr超能文献

用音调阶跃刺激和离散纯音测量大鼠的频率辨别能力。

Frequency discrimination in rats measured with tone-step stimuli and discrete pure tones.

作者信息

Sloan Andrew M, Dodd Owen T, Rennaker Robert L

机构信息

Center for Bioengineering, University of Oklahoma, T-335 Sarkeys Energy Center, 100 East Boyd St., Norman, OK 73019-1004, USA.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2009 May;251(1-2):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Mar 1.

Abstract

Two modified go/no-go tasks are compared for the measurement of frequency discrimination in albino rats. The first task required detection of an instantaneous, phase-matched frequency change, called a "tone-step," within a continuous reference tone. The more traditional second task required detection of a frequency change between repetitions of a reference sequence of repeating discrete tones. For each task frequency difference limens were measured over a range of reference frequencies from 2.31 to 27.7 kHz at 60 dB sound pressure level, with both upward and downward frequency shifts. All 24 subjects quickly learned the "tone-step" task to criterion, but only 13 could also learn the discrete tone task. Subjects' performance at either task generally improved with increasing reference frequency, and in both tasks upward frequency change thresholds were significantly higher than thresholds for downward changes. Overall mean Weber ratios were 1.73+/-0.27% for the "tone-step" task and 2.76+/-0.29% for the discrete tone task. However, subjects' performance on the "tone-step" task was not correlated with subsequent performance on the discrete tone task. We suggest that the lack of correspondence between tasks might be due to frequency discrimination processes interacting with short-term memory traces during inter-tone intervals in the discrete tone task.

摘要

比较了两种改良的Go/No-Go任务,用于测量白化大鼠的频率辨别能力。第一个任务要求在连续的参考音调中检测瞬间的、相位匹配的频率变化,称为“音调阶跃”。更传统的第二个任务要求在重复离散音调的参考序列的重复之间检测频率变化。对于每个任务,在60分贝声压级下,在2.31至27.7千赫的参考频率范围内测量频率差异阈限,包括向上和向下的频率偏移。所有24只受试动物都很快学会了“音调阶跃”任务并达到标准,但只有13只也能学会离散音调任务。受试动物在任何一项任务中的表现通常随着参考频率的增加而提高,并且在两项任务中,向上的频率变化阈值显著高于向下变化的阈值。“音调阶跃”任务的总体平均韦伯比率为1.73±0.27%,离散音调任务为2.76±0.29%。然而,受试动物在“音调阶跃”任务上的表现与随后在离散音调任务上的表现无关。我们认为任务之间缺乏对应关系可能是由于在离散音调任务的音调间隔期间,频率辨别过程与短期记忆痕迹相互作用。

相似文献

2
Detection of tones and their modification by noise in nonhuman primates.非人类灵长类动物的音调和噪声对其的修饰的检测。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Aug;14(4):547-60. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0384-1. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
3
Auditory frequency discrimination in the white rat.
Hear Res. 1998 Dec;126(1-2):135-50. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00162-2.
6
Comparison of frequency discrimination thresholds for complex and single tones in chinchillas.
Hear Res. 2000 Nov;149(1-2):106-14. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00171-4.

引用本文的文献

6
Intracellular correlates of stimulus-specific adaptation.刺激特异性适应的细胞内相关因素。
J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 26;34(9):3303-19. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2166-13.2014.
7
Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.利用皮层活动模式检测和识别语音声音。
Neuroscience. 2014 Jan 31;258:292-306. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.030. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons.听觉皮层神经元适应的多个时间尺度。
J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 17;24(46):10440-53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1905-04.2004.
4
The decline of pitch discrimination with time.
J Exp Psychol. 1952 Feb;43(2):96-9. doi: 10.1037/h0057373.
7
Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Nov;106(5):2805-11. doi: 10.1121/1.428106.
8
Frequency discrimination of brief tonal steps as a function of frequency in the lesser bulldog bat.
J Comp Physiol A. 1999 Sep;185(3):247-53. doi: 10.1007/s003590050384.
9
Discrimination of frequency steps linked by glides of various durations.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jul;106(1):351-9. doi: 10.1121/1.427061.
10
A signal detection analysis of auditory-frequency discrimination in the rat.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Mar;105(3):1784-800. doi: 10.1121/1.426716.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验