Arrow Kenneth, Auerbach Alan, Bertko John, Brownlee Shannon, Casalino Lawrence P, Cooper Jim, Crosson Francis J, Enthoven Alain, Falcone Elizabeth, Feldman Robert C, Fuchs Victor R, Garber Alan M, Gold Marthe R, Goldman Dana, Hadfield Gillian K, Hall Mark A, Horwitz Ralph I, Hooven Michael, Jacobson Peter D, Jost Timothy Stoltzfus, Kotlikoff Lawrence J, Levin Jonathan, Levine Sharon, Levy Richard, Linscott Karen, Luft Harold S, Mashal Robert, McFadden Daniel, Mechanic David, Meltzer David, Newhouse Joseph P, Noll Roger G, Pietzsch Jan B, Pizzo Philip, Reischauer Robert D, Rosenbaum Sara, Sage William, Schaeffer Leonard D, Sheen Edward, Silber B Michael, Skinner Jonathan, Shortell Stephen M, Thier Samuel O, Tunis Sean, Wulsin Lucien, Yock Paul, Nun Gabi Bin, Bryan Stirling, Luxenburg Osnat, van de Ven Wynand P M M
Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6072, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):493-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00115. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
The coverage, cost, and quality problems of the U.S. health care system are evident. Sustainable health care reform must go beyond financing expanded access to care to substantially changing the organization and delivery of care. The FRESH-Thinking Project (www.fresh-thinking.org) held a series of workshops during which physicians, health policy experts, health insurance executives, business leaders, hospital administrators, economists, and others who represent diverse perspectives came together. This group agreed that the following 8 recommendations are fundamental to successful reform: 1. Replace the current fee-for-service payment system with a payment system that encourages and rewards innovation in the efficient delivery of quality care. The new payment system should invest in the development of outcome measures to guide payment. 2. Establish a securely funded, independent agency to sponsor and evaluate research on the comparative effectiveness of drugs, devices, and other medical interventions. 3. Simplify and rationalize federal and state laws and regulations to facilitate organizational innovation, support care coordination, and streamline financial and administrative functions. 4. Develop a health information technology infrastructure with national standards of interoperability to promote data exchange. 5. Create a national health database with the participation of all payers, delivery systems, and others who own health care data. Agree on methods to make de-identified information from this database on clinical interventions, patient outcomes, and costs available to researchers. 6. Identify revenue sources, including a cap on the tax exclusion of employer-based health insurance, to subsidize health care coverage with the goal of insuring all Americans. 7. Create state or regional insurance exchanges to pool risk, so that Americans without access to employer-based or other group insurance could obtain a standard benefits package through these exchanges. Employers should also be allowed to participate in these exchanges for their employees' coverage. 8. Create a health coverage board with broad stakeholder representation to determine and periodically update the affordable standard benefit package available through state or regional insurance exchanges.
美国医疗保健系统在覆盖范围、成本和质量方面的问题显而易见。可持续的医疗保健改革必须超越为扩大医疗服务可及性提供资金的范畴,切实改变医疗服务的组织和提供方式。“创新思维项目”(www.fresh-thinking.org)举办了一系列研讨会,来自不同领域的医生、卫生政策专家、医疗保险高管、企业领袖、医院管理人员、经济学家及其他人士齐聚一堂。该小组一致认为,以下八项建议是成功改革的基础:1. 用一种鼓励并奖励高效提供优质医疗服务创新的支付系统取代现行的按服务收费支付系统。新的支付系统应投入资源制定结果指标以指导支付。2. 设立一个资金充足、独立的机构,以赞助和评估药物、器械及其他医疗干预措施的比较效果研究。3. 简化并合理化联邦和州的法律法规,以促进组织创新、支持医疗协调并简化财务和行政职能。4. 开发具有全国互操作性标准的健康信息技术基础设施,以促进数据交换。5. 创建一个全国性健康数据库,所有支付方、医疗服务提供系统及其他拥有医疗保健数据的机构都要参与其中。就如何使该数据库中经过去识别处理的有关临床干预、患者结果和成本的信息可供研究人员使用达成一致方法。6. 确定收入来源,包括对基于雇主的医疗保险税收优惠设置上限,以为医疗保险提供补贴,目标是确保所有美国人都能参保。7. 创建州或地区性保险交易所来汇聚风险,这样没有基于雇主或其他团体保险的美国人可以通过这些交易所获得标准福利套餐。雇主也应被允许参与这些交易所为其员工提供保险。8. 创建一个有广泛利益相关者代表参与的医保覆盖范围委员会,以确定并定期更新通过州或地区性保险交易所可获得的负担得起的标准福利套餐。