Laughlin M H, Roseguini B
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;59 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):71-88.
Skeletal muscle blood flow capacity (BFC) is increased by exercise training due to structural vascular remodeling (in the form of angiogenesis of capillaries and remodeling of the arterial tree within skeletal muscle) and/or altered control of vascular resistance. Changes in control can be central or the result of changes in reactivity of arteries and arterioles (due to changes in vascular smooth muscle and/or endothelium). The purpose of this review is to evaluate the relative importance of these mechanisms for increased BFC following interval sprint training (IST) and endurance exercise training (ET). Based on the results discussed herein we conclude that the importance of each of these mechanisms varies throughout muscle tissue due to interactions of muscle fiber-type composition and muscle fiber recruitment patterns during exercise. The distribution of vascular adaptive changes varies with mode of training. For example, IST has been shown to produce the greatest relative increase in contractile activity in fast-twitch, white, skeletal muscle (i.e. white gastrocnemius muscle (Gw) and Gw muscle exhibits the largest increase in oxidative capacity, capillary density, BFC, and changes in vascular cells with IST. In contrast, ET has been shown to produce the greatest relative increase in contractile activity in red gastrocnemius muscle (Gr), and Gr muscle exhibits the largest increase in oxidative capacity, capillary density, and BFC after ET training. Results demonstrate that the increases in BFC are not mediated solely by structural adaptation. Rather, changes in vascular control predominate in Gr and soleus muscle, while increases in arteriolar and capillary density predominate following IST in Gw. Finally, evidence indicates that ET and IST induce non-uniform changes in smooth muscle and endothelium throughout skeletal muscle arteriolar networks.
运动训练可增加骨骼肌血流量(BFC),这是由于结构性血管重塑(以毛细血管生成和骨骼肌内动脉树重塑的形式)和/或血管阻力控制的改变。控制的变化可以是中枢性的,也可以是动脉和小动脉反应性变化的结果(由于血管平滑肌和/或内皮的变化)。本综述的目的是评估这些机制对于间歇冲刺训练(IST)和耐力运动训练(ET)后BFC增加的相对重要性。基于本文讨论的结果,我们得出结论,由于运动期间肌纤维类型组成和肌纤维募集模式的相互作用,这些机制中的每一种在整个肌肉组织中的重要性各不相同。血管适应性变化的分布因训练方式而异。例如,已证明IST在快肌、白色骨骼肌(即白色腓肠肌(Gw))中产生最大的收缩活动相对增加,并且Gw肌肉在IST后表现出氧化能力、毛细血管密度、BFC以及血管细胞变化的最大增加。相比之下,已证明ET在红色腓肠肌(Gr)中产生最大的收缩活动相对增加,并且Gr肌肉在ET训练后表现出氧化能力、毛细血管密度和BFC的最大增加。结果表明,BFC的增加并非仅由结构适应介导。相反,血管控制的变化在Gr和比目鱼肌中占主导,而在Gw中,小动脉和毛细血管密度的增加在IST后占主导。最后,有证据表明ET和IST在整个骨骼肌小动脉网络中诱导平滑肌和内皮的不均匀变化。